[Asterisk-Dev] asterisk "stable"?

Greg Boehnlein damin at nacs.net
Mon May 2 11:27:33 MST 2005


On Mon, 2 May 2005, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> <frustrated>
> Hi
> 
> running 1.0.6/1.0.7, I keep seeing numerous bugs such as huge memory 
> leaks, rtp overflows, application bugs etc etc. Wasn't the 1.0.x track 
> meant to be stable? Or does "stable" only mean "feature freeze"? Will 
> asterisk 1.2.x be just as badly tested as the 1.0.x track?
> 
> roy
> </frustrated>

Roy,
	And running 1.0.7 on my production gateways sees no problems 
whatsoever, completing roughly 40,000 minutes / day of traffic on the 
lowest usage unit.

Stable doesn't mean "Without bugs or problems". Stable simply means "No 
New Added Functionality, Bug Fixes Only".

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST






More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list