[Asterisk-Dev] asterisk "stable"?
Greg Boehnlein
damin at nacs.net
Mon May 2 11:27:33 MST 2005
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> <frustrated>
> Hi
>
> running 1.0.6/1.0.7, I keep seeing numerous bugs such as huge memory
> leaks, rtp overflows, application bugs etc etc. Wasn't the 1.0.x track
> meant to be stable? Or does "stable" only mean "feature freeze"? Will
> asterisk 1.2.x be just as badly tested as the 1.0.x track?
>
> roy
> </frustrated>
Roy,
And running 1.0.7 on my production gateways sees no problems
whatsoever, completing roughly 40,000 minutes / day of traffic on the
lowest usage unit.
Stable doesn't mean "Without bugs or problems". Stable simply means "No
New Added Functionality, Bug Fixes Only".
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
KP-216-121-ST
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list