[Asterisk-Dev] G.729 licensing, again..
Craig Southeren
craigs at postincrement.com
Tue Mar 15 18:23:38 MST 2005
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:58:23 -0500
Steve Kann <stevek at stevek.com> wrote:
..deleted
> I contend that it is possible that, if you have paid the appropriate
> royalties by buying the License rights via Digium, you might be able to
> run the actual code from Intel instead, assuming you don't exceed the
> number of licenses you have. But I haven't seen their license
> agreement, so I really don't know.
When I spoke to VoiceAge last year, I asked them if their patent
indemnification was specific to their code, or was applicable to any
G.729 implementation. They were very clear that it applied *only* to
their code and could not be transferred to any other codec implementation.
This makes sense when you think about it.
It is unreasonable to expect that a patent license negotiated for a specific
implementation from company 1 would be applicable to an implementation
from company 2. Quite apart from the issue of why company 1 would *want*
to indemnify products from company 2, there is also the possibility
(probability?) that the company 2 implementation could use a different
patent set than the implementation from company 1, thus rendering the
license either inadequate or overreaching.
In short, I think the answer is no, unless Digium have negotiated a
radically different license from VoiceAge than the one I saw.
craig
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Craig Southeren craigs at postincrement.com / craigs at voxgratia.org
Phone: +61 243654666 ICQ: #86852844
Fax: +61 243673140 MSN: craig_southeren at hotmail.com
Mobile: +61 417231046 Jabber: craigs at jabber.voxgratia.org
Post Increment - Consulting & Services http://www.postincrement.com
Vox Gratia - The Open Source VoIP portal http://www.voxgratia.org
Raving Of A Strange Mind - the VoIP blog http://www.southeren.com/blog
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list