[Asterisk-Dev] GPL Violation alert.. (Actually, isn't)

[Brian West]

Apparently you did leave the mark spencer credits in there.. I was  
looking at the wrong file.. sorry for that one.. but the rest still  
stands.

/b

On Jun 26, 2005, at 4:29 PM, MvPhone wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I don't know if my response made it to the group ...
> But anyways you're finally right :) The package doesn't violate GPL.
> The driver is open sourced and links directly to zaptel & kernel.
> The closed part goes into kernel which is 100% ok.
>
> Appologies received. But it's better first to check ... then ATTACK
> so furiously...
>
> regards
> Martin
>
> On 6/26/05, Rob Thomas <rob at wpm4l.com> wrote:
>
>> Um. Excuse me for being stupid. I can't believe I didn't actually  
>> read
>> the below line:
>>
>>
>>> [...]
>>> ld -r wcfxo2-core.o wcfxo2-module.o -o wcfxo2-helper.o
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> None of those actually are 'wcfxo2.o'. The wcfxo2-module is his. So I
>> was wrong. He's not linking with any GPL'ed code.
>>
>> Apologies to all those concerned.
>>
>> --Rob
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>