[Asterisk-Dev] Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: MAX TNT and PRI calling name (CNAM) facilitymessage

[Kevin Blackham]

For the record:  No love.  No name, no matter how I do it.  Even if I
use Asterisk to send the 'Display IE' in the SETUP message, it is not
inserted in the INVITE.  If anyone has this working, I'm very
interested to see an ngrep/ethereal/whatever trace of the INVITE
message, and your config.

On 6/27/05, Kevin Blackham <blackham at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using 11.0.2 and have not configured the voip profile, I'm using
> media-gateway.  I don't see the caller's name in your INVITE.  That is
> the issue here.  Media-gateway and T1 profiles attached (with some
> trimming).  I configured a mostly empty VOIP {0 0}, disabling h323,
> but no effect.
> 
> On 6/23/05, Leon Sun <leon at timestelecom.ca> wrote:
> >
> > Kevin,
> >
> > Let me know your VOIP {0 0} and your T1's profile.
> >
> > Mine is working fine.
> >
> > Check attached file.
> >
> >
> > Leon Sun
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Blackham
> > Sent: June 22, 2005 11:21 PM
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: MAX TNT and PRI calling name (CNAM)
> > facilitymessage
> >
> > Does anyone have a MAX/APX with working ingress PRI calling name?
> >
> > I recently acquired a MAX TNT on the cheap and it's integrating fine
> > except for one thing.  In the 11.0.0 release notes, it is stated that
> > ISDN calling name will, if present and permitted by presentation
> > flags, be added to the From: and Remote-Party-ID: headers of the
> > INVITE.  I'm not able to make this happen.  Pcap captures show it is
> > indeed in neither header, and I suspect the MAX is sending the INVITE
> > before it receives this data.  Debug traces show it does receive the
> > message, but due to limitations of the CLI, I cannot correlate whether
> > it's received before or after the INVITE is dispatched.  It works
> > great direct to Asterisk (of course) via TE410P on the same NI-2
> > spans.
> >
> > My FACILITY message that contains the CNAM wanders in from 100 to
> > 400ms after the initial SETUP.  I can't seem to find any way to get
> > the MAX to stall for a half-second before invoking the INVITE (if
> > that's even the issue).  Is my provider too slow?  Is there another
> > valid way for CNAM to be provided during the SETUP message, assuming
> > my provider can stall the call setup until the SS7 query is returned?
> > (google for Q.931 docs not helping me much there either)
> >
> > I know this isn't the place for Ascend/Lucent MAX discussion, but
> > there doesn't seem to be anything active out there.  I'm looking for a
> > mail list/newsgroup/community if there is one still alive.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Users mailing list
> > Asterisk-Users at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>