[Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk mailing lists.
Steven Critchfield
critch at basesys.com
Thu Jan 27 11:08:52 MST 2005
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Adams wrote:
> I would put my vote in for this, even though I will probably subscribe to
> both head and stable lists, I think it would be great for sorting what the
> message is about, since the subject of the message would containg head or
> stable.
How about not splitting the list but rather forcing the users to put a
tag in the subject that was either [HEAD] or [STABLE] and a filter that
rejects any non conforming message back to the original poster with a
copy of posting guidelines. Either they would learn to read them or they
wouldn't get to clog our boxes.
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jerris, Michael MI wrote:
>
> > I personally like Asterisk-HEAD and renaming the users list
> > Asterisk-STABLE. The issue is how do we get Dev to really be a source
> > code based forum, not the place people go to discuss bugs?
> >
> > Asterisk-STABLE: discussion of configuration, bugs, and issues with
> > Asterisk Stable branch. If you run stable and are having a problem,
> > post here.
> > Asterisk-HEAD: discussion of configuration, bugs, and issues with
> > Asterisk HEAD branch. If you run HEAD and are having a problem, post
> > here. Maybe also a place to discuss new feature requests without
> > attached patches to support, or does that belong in DEV? I am guessing
> > here because there will be a high signal:noise on these as many are
> > really "How do I do x" when it comes down to it that it should probably
> > stay here.
> > Asterisk-Dev: Discussion of sourcecode, API's, features in development,
> > issues currently in Mantis and such,
> > not for bug reports (even if it is an "issue in the code"), operational
> > questions, or feature requests without code?
> >
--
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list