[Asterisk-Dev] Re: FW: asterisk/apps app_meetme.c,1.71,1.72
Matthew Boehm
mboehm at cytelcom.com
Mon Jan 24 07:40:48 MST 2005
You guys might want to call it something else as to not add confusion to
this:
http://www.areski.net/asterisk-meetme/about.php?s=0
Call it 'MeetMeBWK' or something.. :)
BWK obviously standing
(http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&Acronym=BWK&Find=Fin
d) for 'Bundeswehr Krankenhaus' which in German means 'German Federal Armed
Forces hospital'
So 'MeetMe at the German Federal Armed Forces hospital'
kinda catchy.. :)
-Matthew
P.S. yes, its monday morning and im at work and im bored..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian West" <brian at bkw.org>
To: "'Asterisk Developers Mailing List'" <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: FW: asterisk/apps app_meetme.c,1.71,1.72
> I just spoke with mark and we are all gonna get together and come up with
> MeetMe2 (it will be in addons for a while)
>
> bkw
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> > bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Brian West
> > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 2:18 PM
> > To: 'Asterisk Developers Mailing List'
> > Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: FW: asterisk/apps app_meetme.c,1.71,1.72
> >
> > http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003402
> >
> > Yes we posted a new bug with ours.. but since deleted the attachments. I
> > did
> > voice my opinion to mark and everyone else involved but nobody would
> > listen
> > to me. So I gave up.
> >
> > bkw
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> > > bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tony Mountifield
> > > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 2:04 PM
> > > To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
> > > Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: FW: asterisk/apps app_meetme.c,1.71,1.72
> > >
> > > In article <auto-000022798362 at cgp1.tulsaconnect.com>,
> > > Brian West <brian at bkw.org> wrote:
> > > > I think this should have been talked about a bit longer before it
was
> > > > commited. I don't feel its 100% correct. I think the way anthm
> > > > implemented it was better... it included outcalling... let you start
> > > > and stop recording from the admin menu(reusing existing routines)...
> > > > converted it to use flags.
> > >
> > > Just looked at your comments on that bug report #3393. You didn't say
> > > anything like the above in there - just a couple of helpful comments
> > > about implementation details, but nothing to suggest to wait because
you
> > > thought there was a better overall approach.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Tony
> > > --
> > > Tony Mountifield
> > > Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
> > > Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> > > Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> > Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list