[Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk Maintenance Crew

[Brian West]

I would agree that we might want to tag and release 1.0.4 then branch head
into stable and get ready for 1.1 allowing time for it to stabilize?

bkw

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tilghman Lesher
> Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 11:05 PM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk Maintenance Crew
> 
> On Sunday 02 January 2005 22:59, russelb at CLEMSON.EDU wrote:
> > Since the release of Asterisk 1.0, I have been maintaining the
> > stable branch of Asterisk, zaptel, and libpri.  I am very excited
> > that I have been able to contribute to the project by making stable
> > bug-fix releases so that CVS head can be developed more
> > aggressively.  However, since the two trees have grown apart so
> > much, I have to do almost every patch by hand.  I have been
> > thinking of some ways that this type of maintenance work could be
> > done more efficiently.
> 
> Would the increasing distance between 1.0 and CVS-HEAD and the
> increasing difficulty in backporting fixes perhaps suggest that we
> should start on the release cycle of 1.1?
> 
> --
> Tilghman
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev