[Asterisk-Dev] new jitterbuffer in 1.2?
Mike Taht
mike.taht at gmail.com
Wed Feb 23 15:46:16 MST 2005
No, I'm not terminating to zap. The speex connection I tried was
Grandstream -> Asterisk/RH9 -> IAX Internet to China -> Asterisk FC3
-> Grandstream
It's probable to me that I simply ran into a difference between speex
on a redhat 9 system and a fedora core 3 system. I will try some other
codecs with the PLC code enabled between these systems tonight and
tomorrow.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:13:46 -0500, Andrew Kohlsmith
<akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com> wrote:
> On February 23, 2005 02:46 pm, Steve Kann wrote:
> > I think that presently, if you're call is coming in via IAX, and being
> > terminated to a zap channel (for example), then PLC won't be applied,
> > because the ulaw<->pcm translator is not being used.. That's something
> > that, I suppose, would need to be added somewhere (maybe to chan_zap?).
>
> That's odd -- that would suggest he should not have seen any improvement from
> the old code other than a smarter jitter buffer size. Perhaps he's not
> terminating to Zap though, or is doing something similar to what I'm doing
> (asterisk box in the middle).
>
> -A.
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list