[Asterisk-Dev] Re: ztdummy? is it necessary?

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Olle E Johansson wrote:

> Instead of calling zaptel for timing, we could call an Asterisk API 
> function that on some systems would rely on Zaptel and on some platforms 
> would do some other magic?

This is already planned, along with improving the Zaptel timing 
interface itself. There will be a generic Asterisk 'tick' and tick 
counters, which can be provided by Zaptel or some other source.