[Asterisk-Dev] Dialplan 'i' and DIALSTATUS bugs
Andrew Kohlsmith
akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com
Fri Apr 15 06:48:08 MST 2005
ast-one dial(IAX2/)'s ast-two. Both are CVS HEAD within a week of today.
ast-two's context for ast-one's type=user is somecontext.
[somecontext]
exten => 100,1,NoOp(One)
exten => 100,2,Hangup
exten => 200,1,NoOp(Two)
exten => 200,2,Hangup
exten => i,1,Wait(1)
exten => i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong)
exten => i,3,Hangup
Now, when ast-one Dial(IAX2/ast-one at ast-two/300) I get an immediate failure
with DIALSTATUS set to NOANSWER.
This is bad. Why? Because I cannot tell the difference between dialing a
valid extension that does not answer, and dialing an invalid extension, and
thus it is impossible to provide a failover scenario. Further, extension 'i'
is not being triggered even though it should.
Similarly, I have a PRI and DIDs from 555-0001 thorugh 555-0030 inclusive. My
23 Zap channels dump into the pri context:
[pri]
exten => 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001)
exten => 555-0001,2,Hangup
exten => 555-0002,1,NoOp(0002)
exten => 555-0002,2,Hangup
exten => i,1,Wait(1)
exten => i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong)
exten => i,3,Hangup
Now when someone calls 555-0003 the call gets routed to be. However, the 'i'
extension again does not get triggered, Asterisk refuses the call and the
Telco sends back a "number not in service" message.
If I did NOT have 'i' in there I would agree with this behaviour. However,
since the extension is invalid, I should be triggering 'i'.
Can anyone refute this logic? I want to get everyone's opinion before I start
an attempt to fix this.
-A.
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list