[Asterisk-Dev] Dialplan 'i' and DIALSTATUS bugs
    Andrew Kohlsmith 
    akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com
       
    Fri Apr 15 06:48:08 MST 2005
    
    
  
ast-one dial(IAX2/)'s ast-two.  Both are CVS HEAD within a week of today.
ast-two's context for ast-one's type=user is somecontext.
[somecontext]
exten => 100,1,NoOp(One)
exten => 100,2,Hangup
exten => 200,1,NoOp(Two)
exten => 200,2,Hangup
exten => i,1,Wait(1)
exten => i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong)
exten => i,3,Hangup
Now, when ast-one Dial(IAX2/ast-one at ast-two/300) I get an immediate failure 
with DIALSTATUS set to NOANSWER.
This is bad.  Why?  Because I cannot tell the difference between dialing a 
valid extension that does not answer, and dialing an invalid extension, and 
thus it is impossible to provide a failover scenario.  Further, extension 'i' 
is not being triggered even though it should.
Similarly, I have a PRI and DIDs from 555-0001 thorugh 555-0030 inclusive.  My 
23 Zap channels dump into the pri context:
[pri]
exten => 555-0001,1,NoOp(0001)
exten => 555-0001,2,Hangup
exten => 555-0002,1,NoOp(0002)
exten => 555-0002,2,Hangup
exten => i,1,Wait(1)
exten => i,2,Playback(tt-somethingwrong)
exten => i,3,Hangup
Now when someone calls 555-0003 the call gets routed to be.  However, the 'i' 
extension again does not get triggered, Asterisk refuses the call and the 
Telco sends back a "number not in service" message.
If I did NOT have 'i' in there I would agree with this behaviour.  However, 
since the extension is invalid, I should be triggering 'i'.
Can anyone refute this logic?  I want to get everyone's opinion before I start 
an attempt to fix this.
-A.
    
    
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list