[Asterisk-Dev] Linux leaves Bitkeeper: quite a dustup

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 23:21 -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Monday 11 April 2005 22:52, Brian Capouch wrote:
> > There's an article about it on Google today.  Quite a bit has been
> > written about it in various places.  One such is at the link below.
> > Looks to be a nice kettle of fish, involving a lot of hard feelings
> > all around:
> 
> I fail to see how this is on-topic for the Asterisk Developers ML.
> Take your discussion to Slashdot.

It's "on topic" because there has been some recent discussion on the IRC
channels (and probably other places) about using something other than
CVS for source code management.  BitKeeper was prominantly mentioned as
a leading candidate.  Of course, now that there will no longer be a free
version of BitKeeper, BitKeeper is less of an attractive candidate.

Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20050411/c9defde7/attachment.pgp