[Asterisk-Dev] thread-safe and reentrant functions

[Gene Kochanowsky]

Forget I brought it up.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Smith [mailto:jsmith at drgutah.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:00 PM
To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] thread-safe and reentrant functions


More comments below...

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 11:00, Gene Kochanowsky wrote:
> I would recommend it because it will force you to rigorously architect
> the application and would make it easier for others to understand
> Asterisks architecture by just examining the code. Also I think the
> functionality of Asterisk is a natural for multiple-inheritance. I
> also think that it would allow you to create classes for threading and
> thread safe code that was easily maintainable across the entire
> application from a few classes. It would make porting to other
> platforms a great deal easier since you could also layer Asterisk. And
> lastly, I think it would allow you to architect Asterisk to make it a
> great deal more extensible than it is now. Design by functional
> decomposition is okay, but doesn't compare to designing with objects.
> 
> Gene 
> 

None of these arguments seem to really point to C++ per se, at least as
as far as I can see.  Most of your items seem to deal with the
"architecture" of Asterisk.  Can you point to specific examples where
the current architecture is insufficient or inadequate?  I guess I don't
see how C++ "forces" you to rigorously architect anything...  I don't
mean for this to be a personal attack, but is it possible that you see
C++ as the "one true way" of programming and can't/don't want to see
that you can "rigorously architect" a program in any language?

Jared



_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev