[Asterisk-Dev] The hardware codec integration
Bruce Ferrell
bferrell at baywinds.org
Tue Aug 19 23:08:29 MST 2003
Peter,
Thank you very, very much. You said it much more eloquently that I did
when I tried.
Kudos!
Peter Grace wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think this is an unfair assessment -- just because we
> need to check our egos at the door does not mean we're
> disagreeable to making asterisk faster in some cases by
> using hardware DSP's from a company of disputed quality.
> My guess is that many people (including me) are just as
> interested in seeing the answers to the questions you seek,
> however my guess is very few people have the required
> experience with the quicknet cards to take a stab at
> fielding the question.
>
> Simply stating "Oh, nobody's answering my question, and
> meanwhile people are engaging in bigotry on the side, this
> must mean nobody wants to help me" is a fallacy. Some
> people very much like to help, just can't speak
> authoritatively on the subject (myself included.)
>
> Finally, if Bayonne does what you need it to do better than
> Asterisk, then you're more than welcome to say so. Perhaps
> we need to evaluate what Bayonne has that Asterisk does not
> which makes this better, and share ideas between the
> projects. However, what you seem to be doing is pouting,
> which often does nothing but raise the ire of the people
> who put hours of work into making your life just a little
> easier.
>
> Just food for thought there. Open source ceases to be a
> fun hobby when all you hear from people is "THIS SUCKS I'M
> LEAVING UNSUBSCRIBE ME!!~!!"!@!$"
>
> Once again, back to my hole...
>
> Pete
>
>
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> mawali at news.icns.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:08 PM
> To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] The hardware codec integration
>
>
>
>
> I am trying to make a proof of concept here (I am using
> quicknet because
> it is all I have that does hardware DSP). So I have been
> asking quistions
> but I have not gotten any technical answer, just opinions.
>
> And yes I almost got screwed too. But I made sure I asked
> them in advanced
> if G729 will work on linux, and I did find there business
> practices
> unfair. I have tried to make it clear to them.
>
> I have done this in embedded systems so it is no rocket
> science, but I was
> trying to see if I should just use bayonne or if the
> asterisk community is
> open to ideas. I know I wont be missed!!
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Ferrell wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Are you still torqued you couldn't get the DSP load for
>>>free? Is that
>>>what this is really about?
>>
>>Free my ass. My company paid Quicknet a hell of lot of
>>money for G.729,
>>they gladly took my money and enabled it, only for win32,
>>but they didn't bother to tell me that until after the
>>fact. Then they had the balls to tell me they couldn't
>>refund my money. So, yes, that is one reason why I
>>dislike Quicknet.
>>
>>There are many technical reasons too, but it is not worth
>>my time to get
>>into it, again.
>>
>>I will say again, buy Digium hardware, support Asterisk.
>>
>>
>>Jeremy McNamara
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>>Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
> - ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.510 / Virus Database: 307 - Release Date:
> 8/14/2003
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBP0Jg+9W8rcEEsO4aEQL1TACfTeRGf3eioBa156HDdtRAWCO4swAAn34E
> YdpTs+BDvcybvbFz8qjaQNy1
> =gap1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.510 / Virus Database: 307 - Release Date: 8/14/2003
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list