<p><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13673">View Change</a></p><p>1 comment:</p><ul style="list-style: none; padding: 0;"><li style="margin: 0; padding: 0;"><p><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13673/4/configure.ac">File configure.ac:</a></p><ul style="list-style: none; padding: 0;"><li style="margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 16px;"><p style="margin-bottom: 4px;"><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13673/4/configure.ac@2442">Patch Set #4, Line 2442:</a> </p><p><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px;"><pre style="font-family: monospace,monospace; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br> AC_MSG_CHECKING(for pjproject on_valid_pair callback)<br> AC_LINK_IFELSE(<br> [AC_LANG_PROGRAM(<br> [#include <pjsip.h><br> #include <pjsip_ua.h><br> #include <pjnath.h><br> void on_valid_pair(pj_ice_sess *ice) {}<br> void on_ice_complete(pj_ice_sess *ice, pj_status_t status) {}<br> void on_rx_data(pj_ice_sess *ice, unsigned comp_id, unsigned transport_id, void *pkt, pj_size_t size, const pj_sockaddr_t *src_addr, unsigned src_addr_len) {}<br> pj_status_t on_tx_pkt(pj_ice_sess *ice, unsigned comp_id, unsigned transport_id, const void *pkt, pj_size_t size, const pj_sockaddr_t *dst_addr, unsigned dst_addr_len) {}],<br> [pj_ice_sess_cb ice_sess_cb = {<br> .on_valid_pair = on_valid_pair,<br> .on_ice_complete = on_ice_complete,<br> .on_rx_data = on_rx_data,<br> .on_tx_pkt = on_tx_pkt,<br> };])],<br> AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)<br> AC_DEFINE(HAVE_PJPROJECT_ON_VALID_PAIR, 1, [Define to 1 if on_valid_pair callback is present.]),<br> AC_MSG_RESULT(no)<br> )<br> fi<br><br>fi<br></pre></blockquote></p><p><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px;">Do we not already, or is there no way to get the pjproject version number and use that instead? […]</blockquote></p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">I suggested he follow the existing approach because version based checking can be fragile, as it assumes a given version is exactly what is shipped but in the case of distros or other custom builds this may not actually be true - thus why you base it on a functionality test.</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>To view, visit <a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13673">change 13673</a>. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit <a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings">settings</a>.</p><div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage"><div itemscope itemprop="action" itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction"><link itemprop="url" href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13673"/><meta itemprop="name" content="View Change"/></div></div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Project: asterisk </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Branch: 16 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia7b68c34f06d2a1d91c5ed51627b66fd0363d867 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Change-Number: 13673 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Owner: Benjamin Keith Ford <bford@digium.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp@sangoma.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell@digium.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 15:39:13 +0000 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-HasComments: Yes </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Has-Labels: No </div>
<div style="display:none"> Comment-In-Reply-To: Kevin Harwell <kharwell@digium.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-MessageType: comment </div>