[Asterisk-code-review] db: Fix incorrect DB tree count for AMI. (asterisk[19])
N A
asteriskteam at digium.com
Mon Sep 26 11:37:24 CDT 2022
N A has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/19364 )
Change subject: db: Fix incorrect DB tree count for AMI.
......................................................................
db: Fix incorrect DB tree count for AMI.
The DBGetTree AMI action's ListItem previously
always reported 1, regardless of the count. This
is corrected to report the actual count.
ASTERISK-30245 #close
patches:
gettreecount.diff submitted by Birger Harzenetter (license 5870)
Change-Id: I46d8992710f1b8524426b1255f57d1ef4a4934d4
---
M main/db.c
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/64/19364/1
diff --git a/main/db.c b/main/db.c
index 2ad430e..a807fdd 100644
--- a/main/db.c
+++ b/main/db.c
@@ -999,6 +999,7 @@
const char *family = astman_get_header(m, "Family");
const char *key = astman_get_header(m, "Key");
sqlite3_stmt *stmt = gettree_stmt;
+ int count = 0;
if (!ast_strlen_zero(family) && !ast_strlen_zero(key)) {
/* Family and key tree */
@@ -1044,12 +1045,13 @@
"%s"
"\r\n",
key_s, value_s, idText);
+ count++;
}
sqlite3_reset(stmt);
ast_mutex_unlock(&dblock);
- astman_send_list_complete_start(s, m, "DBGetTreeComplete", 1);
+ astman_send_list_complete_start(s, m, "DBGetTreeComplete", count);
astman_send_list_complete_end(s);
return 0;
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/19364
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 19
Gerrit-Change-Id: I46d8992710f1b8524426b1255f57d1ef4a4934d4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 19364
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: N A <mail at interlinked.x10host.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20220926/e8119316/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list