[Asterisk-code-review] build: Refactor the earlier "basebranch" commit (asterisk[16])
Kevin Harwell
asteriskteam at digium.com
Mon Feb 21 15:37:41 CST 2022
Attention is currently required from: N A, George Joseph.
Kevin Harwell has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18017 )
Change subject: build: Refactor the earlier "basebranch" commit
......................................................................
Patch Set 4: Code-Review-1
(2 comments)
File build_tools/make_version:
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18017/comment/d020fa01_e81b6c6b
PS4, Line 103: MAINLINE_BRANCH=$(${GIT} config -f .gitreview --get gerrit.basebranch)
Since basebranch is no longer used can it be removed from the .gitreview file too?
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18017/comment/00a26445_b5015f00
PS4, Line 114: # If we didn't find it, see if this is a well-known development branch.
: # development/<mainline_branch>/<branchname> or
: # devel/<mainline_branch>/<branchname>
: if [ "x${MAINLINE_BRANCH}" = "x" ] ; then
: MAINLINE_BRANCH=$(echo "${BRANCH}" | ${SED} -n -r -e "s at devel(opment)?/([0-9]+)/.+@\2 at p")
: fi
Is this a usual convention? I feel like this case can be removed. It seems specific to how a developer might create branches locally.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18017
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 16
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1cdeeaa0944bba3f2e01d7a2039559d0c266f8c9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 18017
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: N A <mail at interlinked.x10host.com>
Gerrit-Attention: N A <mail at interlinked.x10host.com>
Gerrit-Attention: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 21:37:41 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20220221/2ddb8da6/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list