[Asterisk-code-review] logger: Add custom logging capabilities (asterisk[master])
N A
asteriskteam at digium.com
Fri Aug 13 17:58:25 CDT 2021
Attention is currently required from: Joshua Colp, Kevin Harwell.
N A has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16222 )
Change subject: logger: Add custom logging capabilities
......................................................................
Patch Set 8:
(2 comments)
File configs/samples/logger.conf.sample:
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16222/comment/1f5f188a_187e7c4c
PS6, Line 92: ;custom_logs
> I'm not a fan of custom_logs. […]
Done
File include/asterisk/logger.h:
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16222/comment/abe01697_79142ee6
PS6, Line 333: * \brief Checks if a dynamic logger level exists
: * \param name The name of the dynamic level for which to check existence
: * \retval -1 if no such dynamic level exists
: * \retval positive log level to be used with ast_log_dynamic_level for sending messages to this level
: */
> While this does "check" to me it's more of a retrieval. […]
Done
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16222
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If082703cf81a436ae5a565c75225fa8c0554b702
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16222
Gerrit-PatchSet: 8
Gerrit-Owner: N A <mail at interlinked.x10host.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 22:58:25 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20210813/17dfbb7d/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list