[Asterisk-code-review] res_rtp_asterisk: More robust timestamp checking (asterisk[18])
Friendly Automation
asteriskteam at digium.com
Fri Apr 30 09:00:33 CDT 2021
Friendly Automation has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/15842 )
Change subject: res_rtp_asterisk: More robust timestamp checking
......................................................................
res_rtp_asterisk: More robust timestamp checking
We assume that a timestamp value of 0 represents an 'uninitialized'
timestamp, but 0 is a valid value. Add a simple wrapper to be able to
differentiate between whether the value is set or not.
This also removes the fix for ASTERISK~28812 which should not be
needed if we are checking the last timestamp appropriately.
ASTERISK-29030 #close
Change-Id: Ie70d657d580d9a1f2877e25a6ef161c5ad761cf7
---
M res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Joshua Colp: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Kevin Harwell: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
George Joseph: Looks good to me, approved
Friendly Automation: Approved for Submit
diff --git a/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c b/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
index 607fd91..20504cb 100644
--- a/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
+++ b/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
@@ -356,6 +356,11 @@
int schedid;
};
+typedef struct {
+ unsigned int ts;
+ unsigned char is_set;
+} optional_ts;
+
/*! \brief RTP session description */
struct ast_rtp {
int s;
@@ -392,7 +397,7 @@
/* DTMF Reception Variables */
char resp; /*!< The current digit being processed */
unsigned int last_seqno; /*!< The last known sequence number for any DTMF packet */
- unsigned int last_end_timestamp; /*!< The last known timestamp received from an END packet */
+ optional_ts last_end_timestamp; /*!< The last known timestamp received from an END packet */
unsigned int dtmf_duration; /*!< Total duration in samples since the digit start event */
unsigned int dtmf_timeout; /*!< When this timestamp is reached we consider END frame lost and forcibly abort digit */
unsigned int dtmfsamples;
@@ -5536,12 +5541,13 @@
}
if (ast_rtp_instance_get_prop(instance, AST_RTP_PROPERTY_DTMF_COMPENSATE)) {
- if ((rtp->last_end_timestamp != timestamp) || (rtp->resp && rtp->resp != resp)) {
+ if (!rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set || rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts != timestamp || (rtp->resp && rtp->resp != resp)) {
rtp->resp = resp;
rtp->dtmf_timeout = 0;
f = ast_frdup(create_dtmf_frame(instance, AST_FRAME_DTMF_END, ast_rtp_instance_get_prop(instance, AST_RTP_PROPERTY_DTMF_COMPENSATE)));
f->len = 0;
- rtp->last_end_timestamp = timestamp;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts = timestamp;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set = 1;
AST_LIST_INSERT_TAIL(frames, f, frame_list);
}
} else {
@@ -5560,8 +5566,9 @@
if (event_end & 0x80) {
/* End event */
- if ((rtp->last_seqno != seqno) && ((timestamp > rtp->last_end_timestamp) || ((timestamp == 0) && (rtp->last_end_timestamp == 0)))) {
- rtp->last_end_timestamp = timestamp;
+ if (rtp->last_seqno != seqno && (!rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set || timestamp > rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts)) {
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts = timestamp;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set = 1;
rtp->dtmf_duration = new_duration;
rtp->resp = resp;
f = ast_frdup(create_dtmf_frame(instance, AST_FRAME_DTMF_END, 0));
@@ -5581,7 +5588,8 @@
* 65535.
*/
if ((rtp->last_seqno > seqno && rtp->last_seqno - seqno < 50)
- || timestamp <= rtp->last_end_timestamp) {
+ || (rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set
+ && timestamp <= rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts)) {
/* Out of order frame. Processing this can cause us to
* improperly duplicate incoming DTMF, so just drop
* this.
@@ -6671,7 +6679,7 @@
* re-transmissions of the last dtmf end still. Feed those to the
* core so they can be filtered accordingly.
*/
- if (rtp->last_end_timestamp == timestamp) {
+ if (rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set && rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts == timestamp) {
ast_debug_rtp(1, "(%p, %p) RTP feeding packet with duplicate timestamp to core\n", instance, instance1);
return -1;
}
@@ -7279,7 +7287,8 @@
rtp->cycles = 0;
prev_seqno = 0;
rtp->last_seqno = 0;
- rtp->last_end_timestamp = 0;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts = 0;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set = 0;
if (rtp->rtcp) {
rtp->rtcp->expected_prior = 0;
rtp->rtcp->received_prior = 0;
@@ -8518,7 +8527,8 @@
/* Need to reset the DTMF last sequence number and the timestamp of the last END packet */
rtp->last_seqno = 0;
- rtp->last_end_timestamp = 0;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.ts = 0;
+ rtp->last_end_timestamp.is_set = 0;
if (strictrtp && rtp->strict_rtp_state != STRICT_RTP_OPEN
&& !ast_sockaddr_isnull(addr) && ast_sockaddr_cmp(addr, &rtp->strict_rtp_address)) {
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/15842
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 18
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie70d657d580d9a1f2877e25a6ef161c5ad761cf7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15842
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Sean Bright <sean at seanbright.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20210430/f4bb3e45/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list