[Asterisk-code-review] AST-2017-008: Improve RTP and RTCP packet processing. (asterisk[11.25])
Richard Mudgett
asteriskteam at digium.com
Fri Sep 15 15:45:20 CDT 2017
Richard Mudgett has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/6512
Change subject: AST-2017-008: Improve RTP and RTCP packet processing.
......................................................................
AST-2017-008: Improve RTP and RTCP packet processing.
Validate RTCP packets before processing them.
* Validate that the received packet is of a minimum length and apply the
RFC3550 RTCP packet validation checks.
* Fixed potentially reading garbage beyond the received RTCP record data.
* Fixed rtp->themssrc only being set once when the remote could change
the SSRC. We would effectively stop handling the RTCP statistic records.
* Fixed rtp->themssrc to not treat a zero value as special by adding
rtp->themssrc_valid to indicate if rtp->themssrc is available.
ASTERISK-27274
Make strict RTP learning more flexible.
Direct media can cause strict RTP to attempt to learn a remote address
again before it has had a chance to learn the remote address the first
time. Because of the rapid relearn requests, strict RTP could latch onto
the first remote address and fail to latch onto the direct media remote
address. As a result, you have one way audio until the call is placed on
and off hold.
The new algorithm learns remote addresses for a set time (1.5 seconds)
before locking the remote address. In addition, we must see a configured
number of remote packets from the same address in a row before switching.
* Fixed strict RTP learning from always accepting the first new address
packet as the new stream.
* Fixed strict RTP to initialize the expected sequence number with the
last received sequence number instead of the last transmitted sequence
number.
* Fixed the predicted next sequence number calculation in
rtp_learning_rtp_seq_update() to handle overflow.
ASTERISK-27252
Change-Id: Ia2d3aa6e0f22906c25971e74f10027d96525f31c
---
M res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
1 file changed, 430 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/12/6512/1
diff --git a/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c b/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
index 4881171..7393d57 100644
--- a/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
+++ b/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
@@ -115,7 +115,9 @@
STRICT_RTP_CLOSED, /*! Drop all RTP packets not coming from source that was learned */
};
-#define DEFAULT_STRICT_RTP STRICT_RTP_CLOSED
+#define STRICT_RTP_LEARN_TIMEOUT 1500 /*!< milliseconds */
+
+#define DEFAULT_STRICT_RTP -1 /*!< Enabled */
#define DEFAULT_ICESUPPORT 1
extern struct ast_srtp_res *res_srtp;
@@ -199,9 +201,11 @@
/*! \brief RTP learning mode tracking information */
struct rtp_learning_info {
+ struct ast_sockaddr proposed_address; /*!< Proposed remote address for strict RTP */
+ struct timeval start; /*!< The time learning mode was started */
+ struct timeval received; /*!< The time of the last received packet */
int max_seq; /*!< The highest sequence number received */
int packets; /*!< The number of remaining packets before the source is accepted */
- struct timeval received; /*!< The time of the last received packet */
};
#ifdef HAVE_OPENSSL_SRTP
@@ -223,7 +227,7 @@
unsigned char rawdata[8192 + AST_FRIENDLY_OFFSET];
unsigned int ssrc; /*!< Synchronization source, RFC 3550, page 10. */
unsigned int themssrc; /*!< Their SSRC */
- unsigned int rxssrc;
+ unsigned int themssrc_valid; /*!< True if their SSRC is available. */
unsigned int lastts;
unsigned int lastrxts;
unsigned int lastividtimestamp;
@@ -1655,8 +1659,6 @@
#endif
};
-static void rtp_learning_seq_init(struct rtp_learning_info *info, uint16_t seq);
-
#ifdef HAVE_OPENSSL_SRTP
static void dtls_perform_handshake(struct ast_rtp_instance *instance, struct dtls_details *dtls, int rtcp)
{
@@ -1685,6 +1687,8 @@
#endif
#ifdef USE_PJPROJECT
+static void rtp_learning_start(struct ast_rtp *rtp);
+
static void ast_rtp_on_ice_complete(pj_ice_sess *ice, pj_status_t status)
{
struct ast_rtp_instance *instance = ice->user_data;
@@ -1721,8 +1725,8 @@
return;
}
- rtp->strict_rtp_state = STRICT_RTP_LEARN;
- rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, (uint16_t)rtp->seqno);
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP learning after ICE completion\n", rtp);
+ rtp_learning_start(rtp);
}
static void ast_rtp_on_ice_rx_data(pj_ice_sess *ice, unsigned comp_id, unsigned transport_id, void *pkt, pj_size_t size, const pj_sockaddr_t *src_addr, unsigned src_addr_len)
@@ -2355,7 +2359,7 @@
*/
static void rtp_learning_seq_init(struct rtp_learning_info *info, uint16_t seq)
{
- info->max_seq = seq - 1;
+ info->max_seq = seq;
info->packets = learning_min_sequential;
memset(&info->received, 0, sizeof(info->received));
}
@@ -2372,14 +2376,17 @@
*/
static int rtp_learning_rtp_seq_update(struct rtp_learning_info *info, uint16_t seq)
{
+ /*
+ * During the learning mode the minimum amount of media we'll accept is
+ * 10ms so give a reasonable 5ms buffer just in case we get it sporadically.
+ */
if (!ast_tvzero(info->received) && ast_tvdiff_ms(ast_tvnow(), info->received) < 5) {
- /* During the probation period the minimum amount of media we'll accept is
- * 10ms so give a reasonable 5ms buffer just in case we get it sporadically.
+ /*
+ * Reject a flood of packets as acceptable for learning.
+ * Reset the needed packets.
*/
- return 1;
- }
-
- if (seq == info->max_seq + 1) {
+ info->packets = learning_min_sequential - 1;
+ } else if (seq == (uint16_t) (info->max_seq + 1)) {
/* packet is in sequence */
info->packets--;
} else {
@@ -2389,7 +2396,23 @@
info->max_seq = seq;
info->received = ast_tvnow();
- return (info->packets == 0);
+ return info->packets;
+}
+
+/*!
+ * \brief Start the strictrtp learning mode.
+ *
+ * \param rtp RTP session description
+ *
+ * \return Nothing
+ */
+static void rtp_learning_start(struct ast_rtp *rtp)
+{
+ rtp->strict_rtp_state = STRICT_RTP_LEARN;
+ memset(&rtp->rtp_source_learn.proposed_address, 0,
+ sizeof(rtp->rtp_source_learn.proposed_address));
+ rtp->rtp_source_learn.start = ast_tvnow();
+ rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, (uint16_t) rtp->lastrxseqno);
}
#ifdef USE_PJPROJECT
@@ -2546,10 +2569,7 @@
/* Set default parameters on the newly created RTP structure */
rtp->ssrc = ast_random();
rtp->seqno = ast_random() & 0x7fff;
- rtp->strict_rtp_state = (strictrtp ? STRICT_RTP_LEARN : STRICT_RTP_OPEN);
- if (strictrtp) {
- rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, (uint16_t)rtp->seqno);
- }
+ rtp->strict_rtp_state = (strictrtp ? STRICT_RTP_CLOSED : STRICT_RTP_OPEN);
/* Create a new socket for us to listen on and use */
if ((rtp->s =
@@ -3867,13 +3887,86 @@
return &rtp->f;
}
+static const char *rtcp_payload_type2str(unsigned int pt)
+{
+ const char *str;
+
+ switch (pt) {
+ case RTCP_PT_SR:
+ str = "Sender Report";
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_RR:
+ str = "Receiver Report";
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_FUR:
+ /* Full INTRA-frame Request / Fast Update Request */
+ str = "H.261 FUR";
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_SDES:
+ str = "Source Description";
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_BYE:
+ str = "BYE";
+ break;
+ default:
+ str = "Unknown";
+ break;
+ }
+ return str;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Unshifted RTCP header bit field masks
+ */
+#define RTCP_LENGTH_MASK 0xFFFF
+#define RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_MASK 0xFF
+#define RTCP_REPORT_COUNT_MASK 0x1F
+#define RTCP_PADDING_MASK 0x01
+#define RTCP_VERSION_MASK 0x03
+
+/*
+ * RTCP header bit field shift offsets
+ */
+#define RTCP_LENGTH_SHIFT 0
+#define RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_SHIFT 16
+#define RTCP_REPORT_COUNT_SHIFT 24
+#define RTCP_PADDING_SHIFT 29
+#define RTCP_VERSION_SHIFT 30
+
+#define RTCP_VERSION 2U
+#define RTCP_VERSION_SHIFTED (RTCP_VERSION << RTCP_VERSION_SHIFT)
+#define RTCP_VERSION_MASK_SHIFTED (RTCP_VERSION_MASK << RTCP_VERSION_SHIFT)
+
+/*
+ * RTCP first packet record validity header mask and value.
+ *
+ * RFC3550 intentionally defines the encoding of RTCP_PT_SR and RTCP_PT_RR
+ * such that they differ in the least significant bit. Either of these two
+ * payload types MUST be the first RTCP packet record in a compound packet.
+ *
+ * RFC3550 checks the padding bit in the algorithm they use to check the
+ * RTCP packet for validity. However, we aren't masking the padding bit
+ * to check since we don't know if it is a compound RTCP packet or not.
+ */
+#define RTCP_VALID_MASK (RTCP_VERSION_MASK_SHIFTED | (((RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_MASK & ~0x1)) << RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_SHIFT))
+#define RTCP_VALID_VALUE (RTCP_VERSION_SHIFTED | (RTCP_PT_SR << RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_SHIFT))
+
+#define RTCP_SR_BLOCK_WORD_LENGTH 5
+#define RTCP_RR_BLOCK_WORD_LENGTH 6
+#define RTCP_HEADER_SSRC_LENGTH 2
+
static struct ast_frame *ast_rtcp_read(struct ast_rtp_instance *instance)
{
struct ast_rtp *rtp = ast_rtp_instance_get_data(instance);
struct ast_sockaddr addr;
unsigned char rtcpdata[8192 + AST_FRIENDLY_OFFSET];
unsigned int *rtcpheader = (unsigned int *)(rtcpdata + AST_FRIENDLY_OFFSET);
- int res, packetwords, position = 0;
+ int res;
+ unsigned int packetwords;
+ unsigned int position;
+ unsigned int first_word;
+ /*! True if we have seen an acceptable SSRC to learn the remote RTCP address */
+ unsigned int ssrc_seen;
struct ast_frame *f = &ast_null_frame;
/* Read in RTCP data from the socket */
@@ -3918,56 +4011,170 @@
packetwords = res / 4;
- ast_debug(1, "Got RTCP report of %d bytes\n", res);
+ ast_debug(1, "Got RTCP report of %d bytes from %s\n",
+ res, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ /*
+ * Validate the RTCP packet according to an adapted and slightly
+ * modified RFC3550 validation algorithm.
+ */
+ if (packetwords < RTCP_HEADER_SSRC_LENGTH) {
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- RTCP from %s: Frame size (%u words) is too short\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), packetwords);
+ return &ast_null_frame;
+ }
+ position = 0;
+ first_word = ntohl(rtcpheader[position]);
+ if ((first_word & RTCP_VALID_MASK) != RTCP_VALID_VALUE) {
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- RTCP from %s: Failed first packet validity check\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ return &ast_null_frame;
+ }
+ do {
+ position += ((first_word >> RTCP_LENGTH_SHIFT) & RTCP_LENGTH_MASK) + 1;
+ if (packetwords <= position) {
+ break;
+ }
+ first_word = ntohl(rtcpheader[position]);
+ } while ((first_word & RTCP_VERSION_MASK_SHIFTED) == RTCP_VERSION_SHIFTED);
+ if (position != packetwords) {
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- RTCP from %s: Failed packet version or length check\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ return &ast_null_frame;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Note: RFC3605 points out that true NAT (vs NAPT) can cause RTCP
+ * to have a different IP address and port than RTP. Otherwise, when
+ * strictrtp is enabled we could reject RTCP packets not coming from
+ * the learned RTP IP address if it is available.
+ */
+
+ /*
+ * strictrtp safety needs SSRC to match before we use the
+ * sender's address for symmetrical RTP to send our RTCP
+ * reports.
+ *
+ * If strictrtp is not enabled then claim to have already seen
+ * a matching SSRC so we'll accept this packet's address for
+ * symmetrical RTP.
+ */
+ ssrc_seen = rtp->strict_rtp_state == STRICT_RTP_OPEN;
+
+ position = 0;
while (position < packetwords) {
- int i, pt, rc;
- unsigned int length, dlsr, lsr, msw, lsw, comp;
+ unsigned int i;
+ unsigned int pt;
+ unsigned int rc;
+ unsigned int ssrc;
+ /*! True if the ssrc value we have is valid and not garbage because it doesn't exist. */
+ unsigned int ssrc_valid;
+ unsigned int length;
+ unsigned int min_length;
+ unsigned int dlsr, lsr, msw, lsw, comp;
struct timeval now;
double rttsec, reported_jitter, reported_normdev_jitter_current, normdevrtt_current, reported_lost, reported_normdev_lost_current;
uint64_t rtt = 0;
i = position;
- length = ntohl(rtcpheader[i]);
- pt = (length & 0xff0000) >> 16;
- rc = (length & 0x1f000000) >> 24;
- length &= 0xffff;
+ first_word = ntohl(rtcpheader[i]);
+ pt = (first_word >> RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_SHIFT) & RTCP_PAYLOAD_TYPE_MASK;
+ rc = (first_word >> RTCP_REPORT_COUNT_SHIFT) & RTCP_REPORT_COUNT_MASK;
+ /* RFC3550 says 'length' is the number of words in the packet - 1 */
+ length = ((first_word >> RTCP_LENGTH_SHIFT) & RTCP_LENGTH_MASK) + 1;
- if ((i + length) > packetwords) {
- if (rtpdebug)
- ast_debug(1, "RTCP Read too short\n");
+ /* Check expected RTCP packet record length */
+ min_length = RTCP_HEADER_SSRC_LENGTH;
+ switch (pt) {
+ case RTCP_PT_SR:
+ min_length += RTCP_SR_BLOCK_WORD_LENGTH;
+ /* fall through */
+ case RTCP_PT_RR:
+ min_length += (rc * RTCP_RR_BLOCK_WORD_LENGTH);
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_FUR:
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_SDES:
+ case RTCP_PT_BYE:
+ /*
+ * There may not be a SSRC/CSRC present. The packet is
+ * useless but still valid if it isn't present.
+ *
+ * We don't know what min_length should be so disable the check
+ */
+ min_length = length;
+ break;
+ default:
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- RTCP from %s: %u(%s) skipping record\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), pt, rtcp_payload_type2str(pt));
+ if (rtcp_debug_test_addr(&addr)) {
+ ast_verbose("\n");
+ ast_verbose("RTCP from %s: %u(%s) skipping record\n",
+ ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), pt, rtcp_payload_type2str(pt));
+ }
+ position += length;
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (length < min_length) {
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- RTCP from %s: %u(%s) length field less than expected minimum. Min:%u Got:%u\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), pt, rtcp_payload_type2str(pt),
+ min_length - 1, length - 1);
return &ast_null_frame;
}
- if ((rtp->strict_rtp_state != STRICT_RTP_OPEN) && (ntohl(rtcpheader[i + 1]) != rtp->themssrc)) {
- /* Skip over this RTCP record as it does not contain the correct SSRC */
- position += (length + 1);
- ast_debug(1, "%p -- Received RTCP report from %s, dropping due to strict RTP protection. Received SSRC '%u' but expected '%u'\n",
- rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), ntohl(rtcpheader[i + 1]), rtp->themssrc);
- continue;
- }
-
- if (ast_rtp_instance_get_prop(instance, AST_RTP_PROPERTY_NAT)) {
- /* Send to whoever sent to us */
- if (ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->rtcp->them, &addr)) {
- ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->rtcp->them, &addr);
- if (rtpdebug)
- ast_debug(0, "RTCP NAT: Got RTCP from other end. Now sending to address %s\n",
- ast_sockaddr_stringify(&rtp->rtcp->them));
- }
+ /* Get the RTCP record SSRC if defined for the record */
+ ssrc_valid = 1;
+ switch (pt) {
+ case RTCP_PT_SR:
+ case RTCP_PT_RR:
+ case RTCP_PT_FUR:
+ ssrc = ntohl(rtcpheader[i + 1]);
+ break;
+ case RTCP_PT_SDES:
+ case RTCP_PT_BYE:
+ default:
+ ssrc = 0;
+ ssrc_valid = 0;
+ break;
}
if (rtcp_debug_test_addr(&addr)) {
- ast_verbose("\n\nGot RTCP from %s\n",
- ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
- ast_verbose("PT: %d(%s)\n", pt, (pt == 200) ? "Sender Report" : (pt == 201) ? "Receiver Report" : (pt == 192) ? "H.261 FUR" : "Unknown");
- ast_verbose("Reception reports: %d\n", rc);
- ast_verbose("SSRC of sender: %u\n", rtcpheader[i + 1]);
+ ast_verbose("\n");
+ ast_verbose("RTCP from %s\n", ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ ast_verbose("PT: %u(%s)\n", pt, rtcp_payload_type2str(pt));
+ ast_verbose("Reception reports: %u\n", rc);
+ ast_verbose("SSRC of sender: %u\n", ssrc);
}
- i += 2; /* Advance past header and ssrc */
+ if (ssrc_valid && rtp->themssrc_valid) {
+ if (ssrc != rtp->themssrc) {
+ /*
+ * Skip over this RTCP record as it does not contain the
+ * correct SSRC. We should not act upon RTCP records
+ * for a different stream.
+ */
+ position += length;
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- RTCP from %s: Skipping record, received SSRC '%u' != expected '%u'\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), ssrc, rtp->themssrc);
+ continue;
+ }
+ ssrc_seen = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (ssrc_seen && ast_rtp_instance_get_prop(instance, AST_RTP_PROPERTY_NAT)) {
+ /* Send to whoever sent to us */
+ if (ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->rtcp->them, &addr)) {
+ ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->rtcp->them, &addr);
+ if (rtpdebug) {
+ ast_debug(0, "RTCP NAT: Got RTCP from other end. Now sending to address %s\n",
+ ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ i += RTCP_HEADER_SSRC_LENGTH; /* Advance past header and ssrc */
if (rc == 0 && pt == RTCP_PT_RR) { /* We're receiving a receiver report with no reports, which is ok */
- position += (length + 1);
+ position += length;
continue;
}
@@ -3983,7 +4190,7 @@
ast_verbose("RTP timestamp: %lu\n", (unsigned long) ntohl(rtcpheader[i + 2]));
ast_verbose("SPC: %lu\tSOC: %lu\n", (unsigned long) ntohl(rtcpheader[i + 3]), (unsigned long) ntohl(rtcpheader[i + 4]));
}
- i += 5;
+ i += RTCP_SR_BLOCK_WORD_LENGTH;
if (rc < 1)
break;
/* Intentional fall through */
@@ -4153,21 +4360,18 @@
case RTCP_PT_SDES:
if (rtcp_debug_test_addr(&addr))
ast_verbose("Received an SDES from %s\n",
- ast_sockaddr_stringify(&rtp->rtcp->them));
+ ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
break;
case RTCP_PT_BYE:
if (rtcp_debug_test_addr(&addr))
ast_verbose("Received a BYE from %s\n",
- ast_sockaddr_stringify(&rtp->rtcp->them));
+ ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
break;
default:
- ast_debug(1, "Unknown RTCP packet (pt=%d) received from %s\n",
- pt, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&rtp->rtcp->them));
break;
}
- position += (length + 1);
+ position += length;
}
-
rtp->rtcp->rtcp_info = 1;
return f;
@@ -4344,39 +4548,156 @@
return &ast_null_frame;
}
+ /* If the version is not what we expected by this point then just drop the packet */
+ if (version != 2) {
+ return &ast_null_frame;
+ }
+
/* If strict RTP protection is enabled see if we need to learn the remote address or if we need to drop the packet */
- if (rtp->strict_rtp_state == STRICT_RTP_LEARN) {
- if (!ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr)) {
- /* We are learning a new address but have received traffic from the existing address,
- * accept it but reset the current learning for the new source so it only takes over
- * once sufficient traffic has been received. */
- rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno);
+ switch (rtp->strict_rtp_state) {
+ case STRICT_RTP_LEARN:
+ /*
+ * Scenario setup:
+ * PartyA -- Ast1 -- Ast2 -- PartyB
+ *
+ * The learning timeout is necessary for Ast1 to handle the above
+ * setup where PartyA calls PartyB and Ast2 initiates direct media
+ * between Ast1 and PartyB. Ast1 may lock onto the Ast2 stream and
+ * never learn the PartyB stream when it starts. The timeout makes
+ * Ast1 stay in the learning state long enough to see and learn the
+ * RTP stream from PartyB.
+ *
+ * To mitigate against attack, the learning state cannot switch
+ * streams while there are competing streams. The competing streams
+ * interfere with each other's qualification. Once we accept a
+ * stream and reach the timeout, an attacker cannot interfere
+ * anymore.
+ *
+ * Here are a few scenarios and each one assumes that the streams
+ * are continuous:
+ *
+ * 1) We already have a known stream source address and the known
+ * stream wants to change to a new source address. An attacking
+ * stream will block learning the new stream source. After the
+ * timeout we re-lock onto the original stream source address which
+ * likely went away. The result is one way audio.
+ *
+ * 2) We already have a known stream source address and the known
+ * stream doesn't want to change source addresses. An attacking
+ * stream will not be able to replace the known stream. After the
+ * timeout we re-lock onto the known stream. The call is not
+ * affected.
+ *
+ * 3) We don't have a known stream source address. This presumably
+ * is the start of a call. Competing streams will result in staying
+ * in learning mode until a stream becomes the victor and we reach
+ * the timeout. We cannot exit learning if we have no known stream
+ * to lock onto. The result is one way audio until there is a victor.
+ *
+ * If we learn a stream source address before the timeout we will be
+ * in scenario 1) or 2) when a competing stream starts.
+ */
+ if (!ast_sockaddr_isnull(&rtp->strict_rtp_address)
+ && STRICT_RTP_LEARN_TIMEOUT < ast_tvdiff_ms(ast_tvnow(), rtp->rtp_source_learn.start)) {
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP learning complete - Locking on source address %s\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&rtp->strict_rtp_address));
+ rtp->strict_rtp_state = STRICT_RTP_CLOSED;
+
+ /*
+ * Clear the alternate remote address after learning.
+ *
+ * We should not leave this address laying around.
+ * It gets set only on a chan_sip reINVITE glare.
+ * We don't want a stale address interfering with
+ * the next learning time.
+ */
+ ast_sockaddr_setnull(&rtp->alt_rtp_address);
} else {
- /* Hmm, not the strict address. Perhaps we're getting audio from the alternate? */
- if (!ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->alt_rtp_address, &addr)) {
- /* ooh, we did! You're now the new expected address, son! */
- ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->strict_rtp_address,
- &addr);
- } else {
- /* Start trying to learn from the new address. If we pass a probationary period with
- * it, that means we've stopped getting RTP from the original source and we should
- * switch to it.
+ if (!ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr)) {
+ /*
+ * We are open to learning a new address but have received
+ * traffic from the current address, accept it and reset
+ * the learning counts for a new source. When no more
+ * current source packets arrive a new source can take over
+ * once sufficient traffic is received.
*/
- if (rtp_learning_rtp_seq_update(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno)) {
- ast_debug(1, "%p -- Received RTP packet from %s, dropping due to strict RTP protection. Will switch to it in %d packets\n",
- rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), rtp->rtp_source_learn.packets);
- return &ast_null_frame;
- }
- ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr);
+ rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno);
+ break;
}
- ast_verb(4, "%p -- Probation passed - setting RTP source address to %s\n", rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
- rtp->strict_rtp_state = STRICT_RTP_CLOSED;
+ /*
+ * We give preferential treatment to the requested remote address
+ * (negotiated SDP address) where we are to send our RTP. However,
+ * the other end has no obligation to send from that address even
+ * though it is practically a requirement when NAT is involved.
+ */
+ if (!ast_sockaddr_cmp(&remote_address, &addr)) {
+ /* Accept the negotiated remote RTP stream as the source */
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP switching to RTP remote address %s as source\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr);
+ rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno);
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Treat the alternate remote address as another negotiated SDP address. */
+ if (!ast_sockaddr_isnull(&rtp->alt_rtp_address)
+ && !ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->alt_rtp_address, &addr)) {
+ /* ooh, we did! You're now the new expected address, son! */
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP switching to RTP alt remote address %s as source\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr);
+ rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Trying to learn a new address. If we pass a probationary period
+ * with it, that means we've stopped getting RTP from the original
+ * source and we should switch to it.
+ */
+ if (!ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->rtp_source_learn.proposed_address, &addr)) {
+ if (!rtp_learning_rtp_seq_update(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno)) {
+ /* Accept the new RTP stream */
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP switching source address to %s\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr);
+ rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno);
+ break;
+ }
+ /* Not ready to accept the RTP stream candidate */
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- Received RTP packet from %s, dropping due to strict RTP protection. Will switch to it in %d packets.\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr), rtp->rtp_source_learn.packets);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * This is either an attacking stream or
+ * the start of the expected new stream.
+ */
+ ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->rtp_source_learn.proposed_address, &addr);
+ rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, seqno);
+ ast_debug(1, "%p -- Received RTP packet from %s, dropping due to strict RTP protection. Qualifying new stream.\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
+ }
+ return &ast_null_frame;
}
- } else if (rtp->strict_rtp_state == STRICT_RTP_CLOSED && ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr)) {
+ /* Fall through */
+ case STRICT_RTP_CLOSED:
+ /*
+ * We should not allow a stream address change if the SSRC matches
+ * once strictrtp learning is closed. Any kind of address change
+ * like this should have happened while we were in the learning
+ * state. We do not want to allow the possibility of an attacker
+ * interfering with the RTP stream after the learning period.
+ * An attacker could manage to get an RTCP packet redirected to
+ * them which can contain the SSRC value.
+ */
+ if (!ast_sockaddr_cmp(&rtp->strict_rtp_address, &addr)) {
+ break;
+ }
ast_debug(1, "%p -- Received RTP packet from %s, dropping due to strict RTP protection.\n",
rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(&addr));
return &ast_null_frame;
+ case STRICT_RTP_OPEN:
+ break;
}
/* If symmetric RTP is enabled see if the remote side is not what we expected and change where we are sending audio */
@@ -4401,11 +4722,6 @@
return &ast_null_frame;
}
- /* If the version is not what we expected by this point then just drop the packet */
- if (version != 2) {
- return &ast_null_frame;
- }
-
/* Pull out the various other fields we will need */
payloadtype = (seqno & 0x7f0000) >> 16;
padding = seqno & (1 << 29);
@@ -4418,7 +4734,7 @@
AST_LIST_HEAD_INIT_NOLOCK(&frames);
/* Force a marker bit and change SSRC if the SSRC changes */
- if (rtp->rxssrc && rtp->rxssrc != ssrc) {
+ if (rtp->themssrc_valid && rtp->themssrc != ssrc) {
struct ast_frame *f, srcupdate = {
AST_FRAME_CONTROL,
.subclass.integer = AST_CONTROL_SRCCHANGE,
@@ -4445,8 +4761,8 @@
rtp->rtcp->received_prior = 0;
}
}
-
- rtp->rxssrc = ssrc;
+ rtp->themssrc = ssrc; /* Record their SSRC to put in future RR */
+ rtp->themssrc_valid = 1;
/* Remove any padding bytes that may be present */
if (padding) {
@@ -4498,10 +4814,6 @@
prev_seqno = rtp->lastrxseqno;
rtp->lastrxseqno = seqno;
-
- if (!rtp->themssrc) {
- rtp->themssrc = ntohl(rtpheader[2]); /* Record their SSRC to put in future RR */
- }
if (rtp_debug_test_addr(&addr)) {
ast_verbose("Got RTP packet from %s (type %-2.2d, seq %-6.6u, ts %-6.6u, len %-6.6d)\n",
@@ -4771,13 +5083,14 @@
rtp->rxseqno = 0;
- if (strictrtp && rtp->strict_rtp_state != STRICT_RTP_OPEN && !ast_sockaddr_isnull(addr) &&
- ast_sockaddr_cmp(addr, &rtp->strict_rtp_address)) {
+ if (strictrtp && rtp->strict_rtp_state != STRICT_RTP_OPEN
+ && !ast_sockaddr_isnull(addr) && ast_sockaddr_cmp(addr, &rtp->strict_rtp_address)) {
/* We only need to learn a new strict source address if we've been told the source is
* changing to something different.
*/
- rtp->strict_rtp_state = STRICT_RTP_LEARN;
- rtp_learning_seq_init(&rtp->rtp_source_learn, rtp->seqno);
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP learning after remote address set to: %s\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(addr));
+ rtp_learning_start(rtp);
}
#ifdef HAVE_OPENSSL_SRTP
@@ -4805,7 +5118,23 @@
*/
ast_sockaddr_copy(&rtp->alt_rtp_address, addr);
- return;
+ if (strictrtp && rtp->strict_rtp_state != STRICT_RTP_OPEN
+ && !ast_sockaddr_isnull(addr) && ast_sockaddr_cmp(addr, &rtp->strict_rtp_address)) {
+ /*
+ * We only need to learn a new strict source address if we've been told the
+ * source may be changing to something different.
+ *
+ * XXX NOTE: The alternate source address is only set because of a reINVITE
+ * glare in chan_sip. A reINVITE glare is supposed to be retried after a
+ * backoff delay so it shouldn't be needed at all. However, I found this
+ * as the best description of why it was added:
+ * http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2009-May/038348.html
+ * https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/252/
+ */
+ ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP learning after alternate remote address set to: %s\n",
+ rtp, ast_sockaddr_stringify(addr));
+ rtp_learning_start(rtp);
+ }
}
/*! \brief Write t140 redundacy frame
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/6512
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 11.25
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia2d3aa6e0f22906c25971e74f10027d96525f31c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6512
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20170915/3e686566/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list