[Asterisk-code-review] res srtp: Add support for libsrtp2.1. (asterisk[15])
Jenkins2
asteriskteam at digium.com
Thu Sep 7 14:01:09 CDT 2017
Jenkins2 has submitted this change and it was merged. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/6416 )
Change subject: res_srtp: Add support for libsrtp2.1.
......................................................................
res_srtp: Add support for libsrtp2.1.
Asterisk is able to use libSRTP 2.0.x. However since libSRTP 2.1.x, the macro
SRTP_AES_ICM got renamed to SRTP_AES_ICM_128. Beside to still compile with
previous versions of libSRTP, this change allows libSRTP 2.1.x as well.
ASTERISK-27253 #close
Change-Id: I2e6eb3c3bc844fee8a624060a2eb6f182dc70315
---
M res/srtp/srtp_compat.h
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Joshua Colp: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Kevin Harwell: Looks good to me, approved
Jenkins2: Approved for Submit
diff --git a/res/srtp/srtp_compat.h b/res/srtp/srtp_compat.h
index c23daab..56ffca1 100644
--- a/res/srtp/srtp_compat.h
+++ b/res/srtp/srtp_compat.h
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
#define crypto_policy_set_aes_gcm_128_8_auth srtp_crypto_policy_set_aes_gcm_128_8_auth
#define crypto_policy_set_aes_gcm_256_8_auth srtp_crypto_policy_set_aes_gcm_256_8_auth
-#define AES_128_ICM SRTP_AES_ICM
-#define HMAC_SHA1 SRTP_HMAC_SHA1
-
#define err_status_t srtp_err_status_t
#define err_status_ok srtp_err_status_ok
#define err_status_fail srtp_err_status_fail
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/6416
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 15
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2e6eb3c3bc844fee8a624060a2eb6f182dc70315
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6416
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Alexander Traud <pabstraud at compuserve.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins2
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20170907/0e28f368/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list