[Asterisk-code-review] res pjsip sdp rtp: No rtpmap for static RTP payload IDs in SDP. (asterisk[master])
Sean Bright
asteriskteam at digium.com
Tue Apr 11 10:13:58 CDT 2017
Sean Bright has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/5431 )
Change subject: res_pjsip_sdp_rtp: No rtpmap for static RTP payload IDs in SDP.
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/5431/1/res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c
File res/res_pjsip_sdp_rtp.c:
Line 460: if (35 > rtp_code && pjsip_use_compact_form) {
> Ahh. So your actual comment was a question: ‘Why does the range ends/starts
> Ahh. So your actual comment was a question: ‘Why does the range
> ends/starts exactly at 35? Please, document that (for example with
> an inline comment and/or a DEFINE into the code).’ That would have
> explained where your are, what you are looking for, and two
> examples how to solve that.
Why does the range ends/starts exactly at 35? Please, document that (for example with a #define).
>
> OK, before I make up a name, just the explanation:
> 34 is the last payload type which was assigned statically
> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/rtp-parameters>. There is no
> higher payload type which has a static ID. The idea of this change
> is to give no rtpmap for those payload types which are static.
>
> Was that sufficient? Then, I would add that as inline comment.
Now I understand. Something like this in rtp_engine.h would make me happy:
#define AST_RTP_PT_MAX_STATIC 34
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/5431
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaa556ab4c8325cd34c334387ab2847fab07b1689
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Alexander Traud <pabstraud at compuserve.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Traud <pabstraud at compuserve.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anonymous Coward #1000019
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sean Bright <sean.bright at gmail.com>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list