[Asterisk-code-review] app queue.c: Fix error checking in QUEUE MEMBER() read. (asterisk[13])
Ashley Sanders
asteriskteam at digium.com
Wed Aug 19 14:49:05 CDT 2015
Ashley Sanders has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: app_queue.c: Fix error checking in QUEUE_MEMBER() read.
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review-1
(3 comments)
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/1106/2/apps/app_queue.c
File apps/app_queue.c:
Line 8079:
> This had caused me some concern in that it might have been a desired featur
I agree and that was an awkward implementation. Good catch.
Line 8097:
:
:
Why was this log message changed from the original? (Maybe it's superfluous at the point of someone looking at the log which makes sense to remove it.)
Line 8015: if (ast_strlen_zero(interface)) {
: ast_log(LOG_ERROR, "QUEUE_MEMBER: Missing required interface argument.\n");
: return NULL;
: }
:
: m = interface_exists(q, interface);
: if (!m) {
: ast_log(LOG_ERROR, "Queue member interface '%s' not in queue '%s'.\n",
: interface, q->name);
: }
I think we should be consistent as much as possible when outputting log messages. In other words, both of these messages (I think) should be prefaced either with QUEUE_MEMBER: or Queue member. It really makes no difference to me. The QUEUE_MEMBER: one may be easier for someone to spot in a log, though.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/1106
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7294e13d27875851c2f4ef6818adba507509d224
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 13
Gerrit-Owner: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Anonymous Coward #1000019
Gerrit-Reviewer: Ashley Sanders <asanders at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mark Michelson <mmichelson at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matt Jordan <mjordan at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Scott Griepentrog <sgriepentrog at digium.com>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list