<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document>
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10">
<meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 10">
<link rel=File-List href="cid:filelist.xml@01C76B28.55E5DCE0">
<link rel=Edit-Time-Data href="cid:editdata.mso@01C76B28.55E5DCE0">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:DoNotRelyOnCSS/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState>
<w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState>
<w:DocumentKind>DocumentEmail</w:DocumentKind>
<w:EnvelopeVis/>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
</w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;
mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:1627421319 -2147483648 8 0 66047 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;
text-underline:single;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;
text-underline:single;}
p
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial;
mso-ascii-font-family:Arial;
mso-hansi-font-family:Arial;
mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;
color:navy;}
span.SpellE
{mso-style-name:"";
mso-spl-e:yes;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in .5in .5in .5in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=blue style='tab-interval:.5in'>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Byron,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Please give me a call tomorrow to discuss
your project. I may be able to give you some insight into your research. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Cheers,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Derrick Moennick<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><a href="http://www.fonality.com/">www.fonality.com</a>
<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>1-877-366-2548, ext 7068<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=navy face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>-----Original Message-----<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>From:</span></b>
asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com] <b><span style='font-weight:
bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Byron Pile<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:22
PM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Commercial and
Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: [asterisk-biz] case
study on switching to Asterisk</span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>Once I get a better idea of what
the telecom here provides in their contract it might be easier to see what I
should include in the Asterisk based system.<br>
<br>
Is switchvox a proprietary system? Or are they based on Asterisk? They don't
mention asterisk on the site anywhere. I've also noticed Digium offers<br>
a support service plan. Perhaps this with an estimated initial setup cost would
be a good comparison to the telecom offering.<br>
<br>
I really want to highlight the flexibility and also feature set of Asterisk.<br>
<br>
Thanks again for your comments!<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:
12.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma'><br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![if !supportLineBreakNewLine]><br style='mso-special-character:line-break'>
<![endif]><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='margin-left:.5in;text-align:center'><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:
12.0pt;margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma'>> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:34:22 -0400<br>
> From: stotaro@totarotechnologies.com<br>
> To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<br>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] case study on switching to Asterisk<br>
> <br>
> The bottom line is that you will save money or at the very least, over <br>
> the course of a year or two, break even. Considering some proposals I <br>
> did on NEC IPK systems several years ago, an eight port conference <br>
> bridge card was $5,000, another $5,000 for an eight port VoIP card MGCP, <br>
> $3,000 for a four port voicemail card, add some other feature and you <br>
> get the point. Also, support contracts were something to the tune of $4 <br>
> per port per month, that includes all ports (concurrent voicemail access <br>
> + phones + PSTN + conference bridges). So lets say that
"whatever" <br>
> company has 4 FXO, 16 FXS, and 4 voicemail, that is a total of 24 ports <br>
> X $4 = $96/mo X 12mo = $1,152 and that only included very specific limits.<br>
> <br>
> This is all free in Asterisk. You could purchase a Switchvox (or some <br>
> other turnkey) system pretty cheaply, have all of those costly add-on <br>
> features included, they offer support via SSH and over the phone, and <br>
> with IP, MACs are a breeze. A low level A+ tech can do it, unlike a <br>
> traditional system where a telephone guy has to come out with a butt <br>
> set, toner, and punch down tool. Most proprietary systems are not <br>
> exactly easy to program even in a "Turnkey" solution.<br>
> <br>
> You have many variables to look at but I think that your paper will be a <br>
> very interesting look into a paradigm shift. <br>
> <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Steve<br>
> <br>
> Byron Pile wrote:<br>
> > I was going to assume that yes, there are Linux people on staff and <br>
> > that they could be taken away to set up and support asterisk. But <br>
> > because I was comparing it to a turnkey solution that most likely is <br>
> > including service as part of the contract, comparing it to a similar <br>
> > contract based asterisk setup makes more sense. However, I guess when
<br>
> > starting this I was hoping to eliminate "license" fees from
the open <br>
> > source solution, but if I'm using a small company, I think its more <br>
> > realistic to assume they don't have a support department ready to <br>
> > devote man hours to an asterisk system when they were using a turnkey
<br>
> > solution before.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks for clarifying the handsets, I was considering using SIP
phones <br>
> > in the case study, but thought it might be possible to
"reuse" some <br>
> > existing equipment. This is also a technology upgrade in this case.<br>
> ><br>
> > I was going to assume that the workers were just as productive as <br>
> > before, but the ROI would come mostly from reduction in operating <br>
> > costs (hopefully). If they don't have any "linux people" on
staff, <br>
> > this makes it harder to include some of the open source benefits
like, <br>
> > fixing bugs, adding features and the other flexibility that Asterisk <br>
> > would provide over using the Norstar.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks for the response Steve, I have more research to do obviously!<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> > Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] case study on switching to Asterisk<br>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:59:03 -0500<br>
> > From: stotaro@asteriskhelpdesk.com<br>
> > To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<br>
> ><br>
> > For several varying quotes, one could go to www.buyerzone.com<br>
> > <http://www.buyerzone.com/> and put in exactly what you<br>
> > specified. You will get several vendors proposing different<br>
> > systems, prices, and most importantly, service contracts. It does<br>
> > cost each vendor about $25 dollars to buy your “lead” so be aware<br>
> > that you are costing them money by doing this. Whether or not<br>
> > that is ethical, is your decision. I am just pointing out that<br>
> > “one could do it”. Make sure to include that you need a<br>
> > conference bridge that can handle unlimited callers, also<br>
> > unlimited voicemail ports, support SIP, and also consider<br>
> > scaling. That should freak them out.<br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> > Does “whatever” company have people on staff that know Linux and<br>
> > have time to learn and support Asterisk? What is the cost of<br>
> > taking them from what they usually would be doing to work on the<br>
> > Asterisk system?<br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> > I would suggest going with SIP phones and a four port FXO board. <br>
> > You could run both systems side by side until you are ready to cut<br>
> > over and then just switch your four POTs lines. <br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> > Most proprietary systems use digital sets so you cannot use a<br>
> > mutiport FXS board. I have used proprietary handset gateways such<br>
> > as Citel and my person experience was very very poor. <br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> > How much ROI is going to depend on increased worker productivity<br>
> > which is fairly hard to figure out and also ongoing average costs<br>
> > of MACs (cost of Moves Adds Changes) as well as support contracts. <br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > Steve Totaro<br>
> > http://www.asteriskhelpdesk.com<br>
> > KB3OPB<br>
> > <br>
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> > *From:* asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com<br>
> > [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of<br>
> > *Byron Pile<br>
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:28 PM<br>
> > *To:* asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<br>
> > *Subject:* [asterisk-biz] case study on switching to Asterisk<br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> > I thought the biz list was most appropriate for this. Hope I'm not<br>
> > wrong!<br>
> ><br>
> > I'm trying to write a term paper on adopting an open source<br>
> > solution over a commercial solution and comparing the cost.<br>
> > Specifically if a legacy system is in use already, when will the<br>
> > initial investment of hardware for an asterisk based system pay<br>
> > off against the licensing fees of a proprietary system. After<br>
> > reading a good chunk of the free Asterisk book "Asterisk:The<br>
> > Future of Telephony" I think that Asterisk is an excellent topic<br>
> > for the paper. <br>
> ><br>
> > I'm new to telephony stuff so bear with me if my questions are a<br>
> > bit dumb, I've tried to do quite a bit of research and reading<br>
> > before posting to the mail lists. So my idea was to use the fake<br>
> > company "whatever" and they have 15 telephones and are
currently<br>
> > using a Norstar ICS with 4 incoming lines and 15 internal lines<br>
> > and I would like to switch this over to an asterisk based system.<br>
> ><br>
> > The reason for choosing the Norstar as this is a turnkey solution<br>
> > provided by a large local telecom so I will be able to get some<br>
> > pricing information for them fairly easily and I think it does<br>
> > what a 15 telephone small office might need...I'm open to a better<br>
> > suggestion if the Norstar is a poor choice.<br>
> ><br>
> > My quick questions are...is it possible that the handsets being<br>
> > used with a Norstar could be converted and used with the Asterisk<br>
> > system? (a bit of asset recovery)<br>
> ><br>
> > A system consisting of a suitable linux server running Asterisk<br>
> > and a Digium TDM2441B PCI Card 16FXS / 4FXO would be a suitable<br>
> > replacement and could deliver the same performance/functions as<br>
> > the Norstar system?<br>
> ><br>
> > I'm going to try and be as thorough as possible in assessing the<br>
> > costs in switching to this system. The most obvious being some new<br>
> > hardware, but also, downtime, training, support costs, contract<br>
> > penalties (if there are any) etc....But this is a term paper and a<br>
> > highly hypothetical situation. And I know my questions are a bit<br>
> > general, but the paper will probably be kept quite general. I hope<br>
> > I can learn more about this cool app!<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks!<br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> ><br>
> > Live Search Maps – find all the local information you need, right<br>
> > when you need it. Find it!<br>
> > <http://maps.live.com/?icid=wlmtag2&FORM=MGAC01><br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> > i'm making a difference. Make every IM count for the cause of your <br>
> > choice. Join now! <br>
> >
<http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwme0080000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=wlmailtagline>
<br>
> ><br>
> > <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --<br>
> <br>
> asterisk-biz mailing list<br>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='margin-left:.5in;text-align:center'><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:.5in'><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>Your friends are close to you. <a
href="http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx%0d%0a" target="_new">Keep them that
way.</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>