<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/31/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Lacy Moore - Aspendora</b> <<a href="mailto:aspendora@gmail.com">aspendora@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
It's like gun control, it's illegal to kill someone (in most cases), but yet, Congress seems to want to continue passing gun control laws.</blockquote><div><br>or pass laws that already exist, that is the *popular* thing when there is an election or other need for attention. Gray Davis did that by banning guns that look like cellphones in california (he was the gov that got booted out of office a few years ago). Guns that dont look like guns were already illegal, but he had to ban this 'new threat'.
<br><br>Its been established that this really doesnt affect anyone given the current FCC rules (which are implicit laws because congress delegated the power to the FCC to create the 'rules' which are made into law by statute) already, the only thing it would do is make it harder to change, the FCC for example cant just change the rule and no longer require 911 service, it would instead take and act of congress and as we are all aware they pass laws easily, and almost never repeal them.
<br><br>As such I will remain quiet on this thread now unless it fundamentally changes its nature.<br><br><br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Trixter <a href="http://www.0xdecafbad.com">http://www.0xdecafbad.com</a>
Bret McDanel<br>Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200<br><a href="http://www.trxtel.com">http://www.trxtel.com</a> the VoIP provider that pays you!