How far did they get with suing CentOS, no ones bothered to make any precedence with respect to trademarks and the GPL. No one has yet won or lost anything in court.<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/6/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">
James Jones</b> <<a href="mailto:james.jones@signate.com">james.jones@signate.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Then why did Red Hat drag their feed when ask for the code, and then<br>turn around and sue Cent OS?<br>Patrick wrote:<br><br>>On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:31 +1200, James Jones wrote:<br>>[snip]<br>><br>><br>>> Which, I
<br>>>fear, that mean Asterisk may be head the way of Red Hat and going close<br>>>sourced!!!!!<br>>><br>>><br>><br>>Maybe you should do a little research before you and make bold blanket<br>
>statements (and top post). Red Hat Enterprise Linux is not closed<br>>source. How could for example CentOS exist without the source? See:<br>><a href="ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/x86_64/SRPMS">
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/os/x86_64/SRPMS</a><br>>Sure looks like *source* rpms to me...<br>><br>>Patrick<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>>_______________________________________________
<br>>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br>><br>>asterisk-biz mailing list<br>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz">
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz</a><br>><br>><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by <a href="http://Easynews.com">Easynews.com</a> --<br>
<br>asterisk-biz mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz</a><br></blockquote></div>
<br>