<div>someone need asterisk prepaid billing ?we provide it</div> <div>www.hfclub.net<BR><BR><B><I>asterisk-biz-request@lists.digium.com</I></B> 写道：</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Send asterisk-biz mailing list submissions to<BR>asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>asterisk-biz-request@lists.digium.com<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>asterisk-biz-owner@lists.digium.com<BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of asterisk-biz digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR>1. Re: Re: VMWare (Greg Boehnlein)<BR>2. Looking for asterisk consultant in the uk (Peter Jones)<BR>3. Re: Re: VMWare (Andrew Thompson)<BR>4. Moscow DID's available on
DIDX.org (Rehan AllahWala)<BR>5. Re: Re: VMWare (Olivier Krief)<BR>6. Re: Looking for asterisk consultant in the uk (charles)<BR>7. QueueMetrics 1.2.1 released today (Lenz)<BR>8. Re: Re: VMWare (Greg Boehnlein)<BR>9. Re: Re: VMWare (James Oakley)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:47:41 -0400 (EDT)<BR>From: Greg Boehnlein <DAMIN@NACS.NET><BR>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: VMWare<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID:<BR><PINE.LNX.4.44.0607182243020.21266-100000@NUCLEUS.NACS.NET><BR>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII<BR><BR>On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, James Oakley wrote:<BR><BR>> On Monday 17 July 2006 11:23 pm, Greg Boehnlein wrote:<BR>> > On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:<BR>> > > Can Asterisk be configured so the paths through it which require the<BR>> > > timing
accuracy of the real CPU get those, while the rest of the server<BR>> > > can be embedded in a scalable VMWare fabric?<BR>> ><BR>> > Perhaps you could tune the living crap out of Vmware's ESX kernel to do<BR>> > that, but at $6,000 / server I doubt this is within most people's reach.<BR>> > Also, the clock on all Vmware products is emulated, not based on a<BR>> > real-time clock, so most all real-time applications fail to work reliably<BR>> > on Vmware.<BR>> <BR>> I've heard of people running Asterisk successfully under Xen, which is <BR>> fundamentally different than Vmware, and is free. I haven't done it myself, <BR>> but I plan to in the near future.<BR>> <BR>> Here's some benchmarks:<BR>> <BR>> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/performance.html<BR><BR>Xen can have better performance, but it will still suffer from the same <BR>issues of clock granularity, as well as a lack of Zaptel
access.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company<BR>http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!<BR>KP-216-121-ST<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:15:01 +0100<BR>From: "Peter Jones" <THE.PETER.JONES@GOOGLEMAIL.COM><BR>Subject: [asterisk-biz] Looking for asterisk consultant in the uk<BR>To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<BR>Message-ID:<BR><3e89a16b0607182015r6b997c9w5c84ba4b43901b76@mail.gmail.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Hi,<BR><BR>We're a small software development company that has a server with an ISDN<BR>card set aside for Asterisk and we've been meaning to set it up as our<BR>office PBX for some time now but just haven't had the time to look into it.<BR><BR>Since phone calls are considered important to us we don't want to rush the<BR>install and not have a full understanding of how it works so we're
looking<BR>for someone to setup Asterisk and the ISDN card as well as provide remote<BR>and on-site (west London) support during office hours.<BR><BR>Could anyone recommend some UK based people and a rough idea of how much<BR>we'd expect to be paying for a competent consultant for per-hour<BR>installation costs and an ongoing monthly support contract.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR>Pete<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20060718/881ceb4d/attachment-0001.htm<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 3<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:04:53 +0000<BR>From: Andrew Thompson <ANDREWKT@AKTZERO.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: VMWare<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <20060719040453.GA17265@aktzero.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii<BR><BR>On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at
10:47:41PM -0400, Greg Boehnlein wrote:<BR>> On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, James Oakley wrote:<BR>> > I've heard of people running Asterisk successfully under Xen, which is <BR>> > fundamentally different than Vmware, and is free. I haven't done it myself, <BR>> > but I plan to in the near future.<BR>> > <BR>> > Here's some benchmarks:<BR>> > <BR>> > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/performance.html<BR>> <BR>> Xen can have better performance, but it will still suffer from the same <BR>> issues of clock granularity, as well as a lack of Zaptel access.<BR><BR>I ran asterisk on a dual p2 300 for about a year under Xen. It ran just<BR>fine for my home use.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Andrew Thompson<BR>http://aktzero.com/<BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 4<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:19:28 +0500<BR>From: "Rehan AllahWala" <REHAN@SUPERTEC.COM><BR>Subject: [asterisk-biz] Moscow DID's available on
DIDX.org<BR>To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<BR>Cc: remoteip@gmail.com<BR>Message-ID: <44BDF920.18615.84200D2@rehan.supertec.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<BR><BR>Moscow, Russia DID numbers are now available on DIDX via<BR><BR>http://www.NXvoice.com<BR><BR>You can contact them directly of buy via didx.org<BR><BR>Rehan<BR><BR><BR>Super Technologies Inc., Pensacola, Florida<BR>http://www.SuperTec.com - Technologies from tomorrow, Today!<BR><BR>MSN: Rehan@Rehan.com<BR>Skype: Rehan33<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 5<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:53:16 +0200<BR>From: "Olivier Krief" <OLIVIER.KRIEF@GMAIL.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: VMWare<BR>To: <ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <001801c6ab00$063fec00$1001a8c0@ORDICUSTOM><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";<BR>reply-type=original<BR><BR>><BR>> Message: 1<BR>> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:26:11 -0300<BR>>
From: James Oakley <JOAKLEY@SOLUTIONINC.COM><BR>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: VMWare<BR>> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR>> <ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>> Message-ID: <200607180926.11980.joakley@solutioninc.com><BR>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR>><BR>> [...]<BR><BR>> I've heard of people running Asterisk successfully under Xen, which is<BR>> fundamentally different than Vmware, and is free. I haven't done it <BR>> myself,<BR>> but I plan to in the near future.<BR>><BR>> [...]<BR>> -- <BR>> James Oakley<BR>> Engineering - SolutionInc Ltd.<BR>> joakley@solutioninc.com<BR>> http://www.solutioninc.com<BR>><BR>Hi,<BR><BR>Does anyone have successfully run Asterisk under Xen ?<BR>How was it set (how many users, which TDM hardware, ...) ?<BR><BR>Regards<BR>Olivier <BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 6<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006
09:25:55 +0100<BR>From: "charles" <C.ADENIRAN@BTINTERNET.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Looking for asterisk consultant in the uk<BR>To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <009f01c6ab0c$f79174a0$0200a8c0@w98sysrec><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Simple question, how many lines(in and how many extentsions)? <BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20060719/812714e6/attachment-0001.htm<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 7<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:59:10 +0200<BR>From: Lenz <LENZ-ML@LOWAY.IT><BR>Subject: [asterisk-biz] QueueMetrics 1.2.1 released today<BR>To: "asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com" <ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <OP.TCXP8WKV3WZJEP@PC-LENZ><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
delsp=yes;<BR>charset=iso-8859-15<BR><BR>Hello list,<BR><BR>I am pleased to tell you that we have released a new version of<BR>QueueMetrics. The main areas of improvement were the following ones:<BR><BR>- Bug fix: the "Show members only" button was not working in 1.2.0<BR>- Improved graphical layout, gadget sizes and rendering in IE/Firefox<BR>- Time zone offsets are now full -24/+24 hours and can be set to a default<BR>- It is now possible to reject anomalous calls, i.e. calls where the<BR>Asterisk logging went wrong for some reason and are left dangling, forever<BR>open. A couple of new properties control the maximum allowed wait and talk<BR>time for calls to be considered open. Note: this does not affect calls<BR>that are logged correctly, no matter what their length may be.<BR>- It is now possible to ignore QUEUESTART events altogether via a<BR>configuration option.<BR>- New feature: auto-scrolling real-time wallboard.<BR><BR>A full list of improvements over version
1.2.0 can be found at<BR>http://queuemetrics.loway.it/news.jsp<BR><BR>QueueMetrics 1.2.1 allows data storage on both flat files and MySQL<BR>databases for bigger call centers. And of course comes with a 90-page<BR>user manual that covers all aspects of it.<BR><BR>QueueMetrics is a commercial call center monitoring package, but is<BR>availabe free of charge for individuals, Asterisk hackers and small<BR>SOHOs. You can request a trial key if you run a larger installation and<BR>would like to test it in your own environment.<BR><BR>The latest version of QueueMetrics can be downloaded from<BR>http://queuemetrics.loway.it/download.jsp<BR><BR>Hope you like it,<BR>l.<BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Loway Research - Home of QueueMetrics<BR>http://queuemetrics.loway.it<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 8<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:21:24 -0400 (EDT)<BR>From: Greg Boehnlein <DAMIN@NACS.NET><BR>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: VMWare<BR>To: Commercial and
Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID:<BR><PINE.LNX.4.44.0607190820100.22611-100000@NUCLEUS.NACS.NET><BR>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII<BR><BR>On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Andrew Thompson wrote:<BR><BR>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:47:41PM -0400, Greg Boehnlein wrote:<BR>> > On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, James Oakley wrote:<BR>> > > I've heard of people running Asterisk successfully under Xen, which is <BR>> > > fundamentally different than Vmware, and is free. I haven't done it myself, <BR>> > > but I plan to in the near future.<BR>> > > <BR>> > > Here's some benchmarks:<BR>> > > <BR>> > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/performance.html<BR>> > <BR>> > Xen can have better performance, but it will still suffer from the same <BR>> > issues of clock granularity, as well as a lack of Zaptel access.<BR>> <BR>> I ran asterisk
on a dual p2 300 for about a year under Xen. It ran just<BR>> fine for my home use.<BR><BR>And I ran my home PBX running Asterisk under CoLinux on top of Windows XP <BR>for a long period of time too. In most light use and testing cases, a <BR>virtualization platform will provide acceptable performance, but I <BR>wouldn't put a business on it.<BR><BR>-- <BR>Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company<BR>http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!<BR>KP-216-121-ST<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 9<BR>Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:52:43 -0300<BR>From: James Oakley <JOAKLEY@SOLUTIONINC.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: VMWare<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <200607190952.43694.joakley@solutioninc.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>On Wednesday 19 July 2006 9:21 am, Greg Boehnlein
wrote:<BR>> And I ran my home PBX running Asterisk under CoLinux on top of Windows XP<BR>> for a long period of time too. In most light use and testing cases, a<BR>> virtualization platform will provide acceptable performance, but I<BR>> wouldn't put a business on it.<BR><BR>These guys did:<BR><BR>http://offshorepbx.com/<BR><BR>I've heard of much success with ztdummy on other providers as well.<BR><BR>-- <BR>James Oakley<BR>Engineering - SolutionInc Ltd.<BR>joakley@solutioninc.com<BR>http://www.solutioninc.com<BR><BR>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR>This e-mail is CONFIDENTIAL and contains information intended only for the<BR>person(s) named. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly<BR>prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me<BR>immediately at 902 420 0077 or reply by e-mail to the sender and destroy<BR>the original communication.<BR>Thank
You.<BR>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --<BR><BR>asterisk-biz mailing list<BR>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR><BR><BR>End of asterisk-biz Digest, Vol 24, Issue 61<BR>********************************************<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR><BR>www.hfsys.net<br><br>生产:<br>1.软交换系统(H323/SIP),支持100-100000用户<br>2.计费发卡系统<br>3.主叫系统<br>4.IP IVR(用于聊天,视频等增殖业务)<br>5.基于skype/qq等的可运营视频系统<br>经营<br>1. 软交换虚拟主机业务<br>2. 主叫叫系统虚拟主机<p> __________________________________________________<br>赶快注册雅虎超大容量免费邮箱?<br>http://cn.mail.yahoo.com