<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
C F,<br>
<br>
I assume you're coming to the conclusion that DUNDi infringes from '
representative claim 1' <br>
in the document you referenced. It also also seems to conflict with
any referral based lookup <br>
including DNS, ENUM, SIP (in refer mode), and LDAP, however, IANAL,
and I cant tell how the<br>
this document relates to the infringement suit. (except that it
references an RTI patent that is <br>
the subject of the suit.) <br>
<br>
However, searching further, I found (
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2005/12/rates-technology-inc.html">http://271patent.blogspot.com/2005/12/rates-technology-inc.html</a> ) <br>
that Patents <a
href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;f=G&l=50&s1=5425085.WKU.&OS=PN/5425085&RS=PN/5425085">5,425,085</a>
(<b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tinyurl.com/9dfak">http://tinyurl.com/9dfak</a> )</b> and <a
href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;f=G&l=50&s1=5519769.WKU.&OS=PN/5519769&RS=PN/5519769">5,519,769</a>.
(<b> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tinyurl.com/c99mf">http://tinyurl.com/c99mf</a> )</b> are <br>
the subject of the suit.<br>
<br>
If you can stand to read through the various claims, you can easily
draw your <br>
own conclusion and understand why google is defending their position.<br>
<br>
/Ed Guy<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
C F wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid81000b5a0601031030x2c29e096wdb47187912a0ddc2@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Interesting story:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,124144,00.asp">http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,124144,00.asp</a>
Here is what I could find about the patent, I'm sure this is not all.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/decisions/fd012260.pdf">http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/bpai/decisions/fd012260.pdf</a>
In any case it seems that DUNDi is also under that patent, if not why
not? as well as using my FTP server with an xml file/database that has
a digitmap for my polycom phone, that my Polycom phone downloads to
make a decision about which device to use (emergency proxy or not),
correct me if I'm wrong.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>