<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Bottom posting - see below:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid200512300235.jBU2ZCx15275@oeth.net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">We have a PSTN phone number forwarding feature that allows you to set
criteria to forward your inbound calls to a traditional PSTN number.
Wilson Pickett wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">FWIW, I use both Junction and Voipjet and find them both to be
excellent and good value.
_______________________________________________
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->Trying to figure this VoIP thing out:
I'm guessing the reason for using both Voipjet and Junction is redundancy?
Or I've also heard that Voipjet is for inbound and Junction is for
inbound/DID.....
Is this correct?
I see the redundancy for outbound (if Voipjet is down, use Junction) but
what about inbound? If Junction goes down, there's no other way to
route the same DID phone number to me, is there? Or is there some sort
of setup in Junction, that if they see the service down, they'll
re-route to some other provider I specify?
Or - what is the benefit of using both providers?
Thanks for putting up with my lack of knowledge.
_______________________________________________
</pre>
</blockquote>
But isn't the idea to get rid of the PSTN?<br>
Is this feature done automatically? Or when I'd notice downtime, I'd
have to log into my account on your website to forward calls?
</body>
</html>