<DIV>good day! i mean we're using asterisk for business....<BR><BR><B><I>asterisk-biz-request@lists.digium.com</I></B> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Send Asterisk-Biz mailing list submissions to<BR>asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>asterisk-biz-request@lists.digium.com<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>asterisk-biz-owner@lists.digium.com<BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Biz digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR>1. Re: problems with bridging... (Justin McAteer)<BR>2. ignore this. (Russell Bryant)<BR>3. Re: ignore this. (Mike)<BR>4. Re: ignore this. (Mike)<BR>5. RE: PRESTON GARRISON - PLEASE RETURN MY MONEY<BR>(Storm D. J. Petersen)<BR>6. Re: PRESTON GARRISON - PLEASE RETURN MY MONEY<BR>(trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com)<BR>7. Re: * and Polycom
(AR Tarzi)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:21:29 -0500<BR>From: Justin McAteer <JMCATEER@DIGIUM.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] problems with bridging...<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <42EFD5C9.8060203@digium.com><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<BR><BR>Ryan,<BR><BR>You should post this question on the USERS list not the BUSINESS list.<BR><BR>Thank You,<BR>Justin McAteer<BR><BR><BR>ryan nalupa wrote:<BR><BR>> hello good day to all! i am a user of asterisk cvs 1.0.7 and i am <BR>> having a problem with bridging...i.e., i have a digium card with 4 <BR>> channels/ports. i connected 2 pstn lines on channels 3 and 4. 1 and 2 <BR>> are ifreedom ATAs. the problem is when i call from a pstn line, either <BR>> 3 or 4 will answer, and when i am asked the extension i'll
dial the <BR>> number to connect to either of the ifreedom ATAs, on channels 1 and 2 <BR>> of course. when done dialling, i get a busy tone and that either <BR>> channel 3 or 4 or whichever answered my call cannot bridge into either <BR>> channel 1 or 2 to connect my call...and worse, the asterisk system <BR>> hangs so i still have to restart my asterisk system...can anyone help <BR>> me on how to configure this???...am really in need of HELP!<BR>><BR>> __________________________________________________<BR>> Do You Yahoo!?<BR>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around<BR>> http://mail.yahoo.com<BR>><BR>>------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>><BR>>_______________________________________________<BR>>Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>>Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>>
<BR>><BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:05:26 -0500<BR>From: Russell Bryant <RUSSELB@CLEMSON.EDU><BR>Subject: [Asterisk-biz] ignore this.<BR>To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com<BR>Message-ID: <42EFEE26.8080702@clemson.edu><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<BR><BR>debugging postfix ...<BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 3<BR>Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:06:28 -0400 (EDT)<BR>From: Mike <AST@UC9.NET><BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] ignore this.<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <PINE.LNX.4.61.0508021706170.17479@MHESS.QN.NET><BR>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed<BR><BR>Please do not waste the SMTP traffic for your issues with postfix.<BR><BR>On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Russell Bryant wrote:<BR><BR>> debugging postfix ...<BR>>
_______________________________________________<BR>> Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>> Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 4<BR>Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:07:23 -0400 (EDT)<BR>From: Mike <AST@UC9.NET><BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] ignore this.<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <PINE.LNX.4.61.0508021707010.17479@MHESS.QN.NET><BR>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed<BR><BR>Shit, I am stupid, I did not relize which Russell Bryant, you are .<BR><BR>Sorry<BR><BR>On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Russell Bryant wrote:<BR><BR>> debugging postfix ...<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>> Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 5<BR>Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:59:42 -0700<BR>From: "Storm D. J. Petersen" <STORMP@TELUS.NET><BR>Subject: RE: [Asterisk-biz] PRESTON GARRISON - PLEASE RETURN MY MONEY<BR>To: "'Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion'"<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID:<BR><20050803000025.IQUX5660.priv-edmwes26.telusplanet.net@mainworkstation><BR><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Slander has to be misrepresentation of the truth. As long as you keep your<BR>story simple and to the strict facts you should be safe.<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com<BR>[mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of<BR>bclem@im-online.net<BR>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:47 AM<BR>To: Jerry Fan; Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] PRESTON
GARRISON - PLEASE RETURN MY MONEY<BR><BR>I would suggest caution on doing this type of thing including posting on<BR>forums,<BR>mailing lists, and websites.<BR><BR>Even though it may be the truth, or it may not...this can be used as slander<BR>claims.<BR><BR>I would suggest if you have a problem with a person or company report that<BR>person to the AG of the state and/or the better business bureau.<BR><BR>Brent Clements<BR>IO Networks<BR><BR>Quoting Jerry Fan <JERRYJFAN@GMAIL.COM>:<BR><BR>> $500.00 was in fact pre-payment towards a month's worth of services. Are<BR>> there forums for discussing and rating the reputation of VoIP service<BR>> providers? Wouldn't be too difficult to put together.<BR>><BR>> On 8/2/05, Storm D. J. Petersen <STORMP@TELUS.NET>wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> > I ? agree with you. I think it's important to expose bad business on<BR>here.<BR>> > Prevent other people from getting burned from unscrupulous providers. I<BR>> > think it
might have been better if you didn't make the message as<BR>personal<BR>> > as you did though. I would of described the situation and the company.<BR>> > That's just my 2 cents. I'm sure their will be many people who have voip<BR>> > services or own voip providers on this list who fear the public exposure<BR>> > that we can give and will moan about it.<BR>> ><BR>> > Good luck with your problem.<BR>> ><BR>> > S.<BR>> > ________________________________________<BR>> > From: asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com<BR>> > [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Fan<BR>> > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 11:49 PM<BR>> > To: trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com<BR>> > Cc: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR>> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] PRESTON GARRISON - PLEASE RETURN MY MONEY<BR>> ><BR>> > Believe me, I felt so disgusted at myself while creating
the first post.<BR>> > It<BR>> > was brought to my attention that I had made grammatical and spelling<BR>> > errors<BR>> > by someone a list member. So I dragged myself through creating a<BR>corrected<BR>> > second post. I am twice disgusted at myself but I feel it is important<BR>to<BR>> > share my experience with others so that they are better informed. If I<BR>can<BR>> > prevent one single member from experiencing the grief and anguish I<BR>felt,<BR>> > it<BR>> > will have made all this effort worthwhile -- including the time reading<BR>> > and<BR>> > responding to your post.<BR>> > On 8/1/05, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com <TRIXTER@0XDECAFBAD.COM><BR>> > wrote:<BR>> > On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 23:04 -0700, Jerry Fan wrote:<BR>> > > Sorry about the previous post - it may have been confusing.I was so<BR>> > > pissed off I didn't bother to check spelling and grammar.Here is
the<BR>> > > intended post:<BR>> > ><BR>> > > -------------------<BR>> > > On May 20, 2005 I sent PRESTON GARRISON an initial deposit of $500.00<BR>> > > USD for toll-free DID service.PRESTON had mentioned that HIS partner<BR>> > > was well established in the VoIP industry and could easily handle my<BR>> > > simple VoIP needs.Since then, I have sent numerous e-mail, instant<BR>> > > messenger, and telephone messages inquiring about the status of ANY OF<BR>> > > THE SERVICES I ordered.PRESTON delivered absolutely NOTHING.<BR>> > > Finally on July 12, I requested that PRESTON return the money.<BR>> > > PRESTON assured me that the check had already been sent to my partner.<BR>> > > We have seen no check.I repeatedly asked PRESTON to directly deposit<BR>> > > the funds into my account the same way I deposited into HIS account<BR>> > > with no success.<BR>>
> ><BR>> > > PRESTON please send my money back -- it has been over three months<BR>> > > now.<BR>> > > -------------------<BR>> ><BR>> > I am unsure why this needed to be corrected here.Once is one thing but<BR>> > twice is just a bit over the top.I should not be privy to this<BR>> > communication, the only reason I can see that you are posting this here,<BR>> > twice, is to either get some level of revenge against preston (whomever<BR>> > he is, and no that is not an invitation to tell me) or to bad mouth him<BR>> > in public in an attempt to make sure that anything he does is tainted.<BR>> ><BR>> > This sounds more like a personal matter.And to clarify I was not<BR>> > asking for an explanation, all questions or inferences of questions are<BR>> > rhetorical, I not only do not require an answer nor do I want one.I<BR>> > just want some thought on why this was done.<BR>>
><BR>> > --<BR>> > Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel<BR>> > UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402<BR>> > US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200<BR>> > FreeWorldDialup: 635378<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)<BR>> ><BR>> > iD8DBQBC7w5e+1olxlzQw5cRAsnqAJ9TKV/dGSPzyNWmiv+8oaWLs2TIyQCfXroO<BR>> > DZLTtzJv87B5lGlnAE+mXzo=<BR>> > =bZLA<BR>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------<BR>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text
attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: smime.p7s<BR>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature<BR>Size: 2884 bytes<BR>Desc: not available<BR>Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20050802/d2be0ea7/smime-0001.bin<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 6<BR>Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:11:12 -0700<BR>From: "trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com" <TRIXTER@0XDECAFBAD.COM><BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] PRESTON GARRISON - PLEASE RETURN MY MONEY<BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion<BR><ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <1123027872.29606.3.camel@rufus.home.tld><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR><BR>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 13:46 -0500, bclem@im-online.net wrote:<BR>> I would suggest caution on doing this type of thing including posting on forums,<BR>> mailing lists, and websites.<BR>> <BR>> Even though it may be the truth, or it may not...this can be used as slander<BR>> claims.<BR>> <BR>truth
is an affirmative defense to libel/slander cases, however you<BR>still have to mount that defense so it may be good advice.<BR><BR><BR>> I would suggest if you have a problem with a person or company report that<BR>> person to the AG of the state and/or the better business bureau.<BR><BR>Even if you arent in NY elliot spitzer may be a good contract if the<BR>company does business in NY, he wants to be gov and his claim to fame is<BR>going after companies that are doing evil things. <BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel<BR>UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402<BR>US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200<BR>FreeWorldDialup: 635378<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: not available<BR>Type: application/pgp-signature<BR>Size: 189 bytes<BR>Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<BR>Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20050802/ddfa26ad/attachment-0001.pgp<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 7<BR>Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 03:31:18 +0300<BR>From: "AR Tarzi" <ARTARZI@BATELCO.COM.BH><BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] * and Polycom<BR>To: "Tom Hayden" <THAYDEN@GMAIL.COM>, "Commercial and<BR>Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <ASTERISK-BIZ@LISTS.DIGIUM.COM><BR>Message-ID: <071a01c597c2$aaeebf30$6501a8c0@Bahrain.ObadelWard.LOCAL><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR>Forgive me for approaching you offlist as I feel this does not belong in a "biz" list. I just need some help.<BR><BR>I have the one Polycom phone (IP600) and I've just installed Asterisk@home.. would you possibly be able to point out how to get these things working.. it took me a while to be able (just) to setup the phone.. <BR>The issues I have are on both the phone and the A@H sides.. (for instance, I was never able to setup ftp so the phone
could pickup it's settings from it).<BR>When I touch the Message key (as another example) it dials voicemail and asks me to leave a message.. (message notification is working).<BR>I feel quite handicapped at trying to deal with the phone. I was barely able to install Asterisk@home (easy doesn't quite do it justice).<BR><BR>Any help would be appreciated.<BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: Tom Hayden <BR>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion <BR>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 18:48<BR>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] * and Polycom<BR><BR><BR>I've got a network full of polycoms and it plays excellently with<BR>Asterisk. What exactly have you heard there are problems with? I got<BR>all the notification lights, buddy watch, and other featuers (besides<BR>instant messaging) to work! I'll help you out if you have any specific<BR>questions.<BR><BR>--<BR>Tom Hayden<BR>Astoria Telecom, LLC<BR>www.astoriatelecom.net<BR><BR>On 8/2/05, Ron Arts
<RON.ARTS@NEONOVA.NL>wrote:<BR>> lnxguru wrote:<BR>> > Good Morning,<BR>> ><BR>> > I'm not sure if `biz' is the correct list or not, so<BR>> > please excuse me if I've posted to the wrong place.<BR>> ><BR>> > My company is running an Asterisk@Home box with<BR>> > Polycom IP500 phones. I've already heard about Polycom<BR>> > and Asterisk not playing well together, but I didn't<BR>> > get to make the decision and I know other people have<BR>> > it working.<BR>> ><BR>> <BR>> Polycom and asterisk work great together.<BR>> <BR>> There are support issues, because Polycom only wants<BR>> to support phones that are on Polycom Certified PBX'es.<BR>> <BR>> However, I asked Digium about this on Astricon Madrid,<BR>> and I interpreted their answer as 'we are talking<BR>> to them, and we will make an announcement in the<BR>> foreseeable future', although this were not exactly their<BR>>
words...<BR>> <BR>> Ron<BR>> <BR>> > Before this gets too in depth and is referred to the<BR>> > `users' list, I may be interested in hiring a<BR>> > consultant on a per incident basis to help me fix a<BR>> > few issues.<BR>> ><BR>> > I'm looking for suggestions and recomendations for<BR>> > people/companies who do this type of work.<BR>> ><BR>> > Thanks,<BR>> ><BR>> > CW<BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > ____________________________________________________<BR>> > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page<BR>> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs<BR>> ><BR>> > _______________________________________________<BR>> > Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>> > Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> --<BR>> NeoNova BV, The Netherlands<BR>> Professional internet and VoIP
solutions<BR>> <BR>> http://www.neonova.nl Kruislaan 419 1098 VA Amsterdam<BR>> info: 020-5628292 servicedesk: 020-5628292 fax: 020-5628291<BR>> <BR>> The following disclamer applies to this email:<BR>> http://www.neonova.nl/maildisclaimer<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>> Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR><BR><BR>-- <BR>Tom<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Asterisk-Biz mailing list<BR>Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20050803/0bc45212/attachment.htm<BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Asterisk-Biz mailing
list<BR>Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com<BR>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz<BR><BR><BR>End of Asterisk-Biz Digest, Vol 13, Issue 9<BR>*******************************************<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><p>__________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com