[asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card

[Bryant Zimmerman]

Mike

On G729 they do 120 with their current firmware.

Bryant

----------------------------------------
 From: "Mike" <list at net-wall.com>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:16 AM
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card

  Sorry to sort of hijack this thread, but isn't Digium transcoding only able to get up to 92 sessions, not 120?   Or did I buy the wrong card?   Mike     From: asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Klang
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card       On Oct 29, 2010, at 9:21 AM, asterisk at dovid.net wrote:  
  Hi,

Does anyone have experience with Digium vs. Sangoma transcoding cards  
? From experience Sangoma has been a lot harder to integrate with  
Asterisk. Wondering what the plus side may be to using Sangoma over  
Digium.       Unfortunately the Sangoma transcoder integration with Asterisk is still significantly harder to integrate than the Digium product.  The Sangoma card has a loopback network interface and audio is streamed to it via RTP, meaning that you have to have a private, local subnet for each Sangoma transcoder card.  However, the big advantage is that Sangoma can get up to 480 sessions in a single card (D100-480) vs. the ~120 that you get with Digium.  If you are needing large concurrencies then Sangoma has a strong advantage.       /BAK/        --    Ben Klang   Chief Visionary   Verendus   404.475.4841   bklang at verendus.com       Insightful Technology Solutions   
  Regards,

Dovid

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz      

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20101029/cf93ffcf/attachment.htm