[asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card

[Mike]

Sorry to sort of hijack this thread, but isn't Digium transcoding only able
to get up to 92 sessions, not 120?

 

Or did I buy the wrong card?

 

Mike

 

From: asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ben Klang
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card

 

On Oct 29, 2010, at 9:21 AM, asterisk at dovid.net wrote:





Hi,

Does anyone have experience with Digium vs. Sangoma transcoding cards  
? From experience Sangoma has been a lot harder to integrate with  
Asterisk. Wondering what the plus side may be to using Sangoma over  
Digium.

 

Unfortunately the Sangoma transcoder integration with Asterisk is still
significantly harder to integrate than the Digium product.  The Sangoma card
has a loopback network interface and audio is streamed to it via RTP,
meaning that you have to have a private, local subnet for each Sangoma
transcoder card.  However, the big advantage is that Sangoma can get up to
480 sessions in a single card (D100-480) vs. the ~120 that you get with
Digium.  If you are needing large concurrencies then Sangoma has a strong
advantage.

 

/BAK/

 

-- 

Ben Klang

Chief Visionary

Verendus

404.475.4841

bklang at verendus.com

 

Insightful Technology Solutions





Regards,

Dovid


-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20101029/4925359f/attachment-0001.htm