[asterisk-biz] Alternative to QueueMetrics
Alex Balashov
abalashov at evaristesys.com
Fri Jan 16 10:40:30 CST 2009
Matt Florell wrote:
> On 1/16/09, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> wrote:
>> QueueMetrics is a great product and I highly recommend it.
>>
>> The main problem with QueueMetrics from my point of view has nothing to
>> do with QueueMetrics whatsoever; on the contrary, it solves the problem
>> it intended to solve very well.
>>
>> It's just that at the point at which the kind of analysis and reporting
>> it provides becomes most useful, a single hostwise queue instance is
>> likely to be inadequate. Queues need to exist on multiple hosts. And
>> since Asterisk doesn't have distributed queues at this time, one has to
>> adopt other means of getting around that problem. And those means don't
>> tend to be compatible with the existing queue infrastructure or allow
>> one to easily use QueueMetrics.
>
> Hello,
>
> I must point out here that VICIDIAL does do multi-server queueing and
> it does generate QueueMetrics-compatible queue_log entries out of the
> box. We have worked closely with the developers of QueueMetrics(QM)
> to ensure that all of the different types of calls and call handling
> that VICIDIAL does will show up in QM properly. There are several
> multi-server Asterisk/VICIDIAL installations up and running using QM
> right now.
>
> I know we have discussed the shortcomings of VICIDIAL here before, but
> I just thought I should mention this.
Point.
But I meant Asterisk more or less out of the box. There are several
products out there that overcome its shortcomings.
It's good to know that multi-host queueing and QueueMetrics can work
together in a ViciDIAL installation though. Thanks!
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775
More information about the asterisk-biz
mailing list