No subject

bypassing the PSTN.<br>
<br>
FWD I think also has peering arrangements with voip providers.<br>
<br>
I would look in those directions first, before reinventing the wheel....<br>
<br>
Moshe<br>
</tt><br>
Nitzan Kon wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:500607.62823.qm at web50710.mail.re2.yahoo.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">--- Alistair Cunningham <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:acunningham at integrics.com">&lt;acunningham at integrics.com&gt;</a> wrote:

  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">I'd therefore say at this point that schemes to publish
internal numbers are not worth the effort.
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
I tend to agree.. maybe in a few years.

Right now, 99.9% of our internal users calling each other do so by the
PSTN number. Our outgoing dialplan just defaults to connect it directly
if available, and if not sends it out to a trunk.

We do have the option to dial someone by their internal number instead,
but I don't think anybody uses it. Just included it because it's
cheap/free to provide and it allows people to forward SIP calls to
their already-connected ATA.

Would be nice if most VSP's joined and created a database to route
calls to each other via SIP instead of PSTN.. but that would take a lot
more than wishful thinking to achieve... :)

--
Nitzan Kon, CEO
Future Nine Corporation

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.api-digital.com">http://www.api-digital.com</a>--

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz</a>

  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>