[asterisk-biz] Sponsor Asterisk development project: SIP attended transfers

[trixter aka Bret McDanel]

On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:38 +0100, Olle E Johansson wrote:
> trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> 
> > I think what you are saying, and please correct me if I am wrong, is
> > that most of what you are doing in terms of these features is already
> > done, and that its to work with the current chan_sip, basically just
> > adding features to it.
> > 
> > Is that correct?
> > 
> Yes, the work that this mail thread is about, is done on current chan_sip.
> 
> Moving to another SIP library is something to be considered for a future 
> version of chan_sip, in the chan_sip3 project.

Now to ask what appears to me to be an obvious question.  Again not to
demean any work that you have done, nor the situation that it put you
in, but if chan_sip3 would be a new sip stack and in theory obsolete
your work by using a sip stack that presumably has all the features you
described plus potentially additional ones (CNG, VAD, etc) why should
resources not be put towards that project instead?

I understand that this can sound inflamatory and that is not my intent,
email often sounds different than it is intended, either too harsh or
too jovial, my intent is just to gather information.


-- 
Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
FreeWorldDialup: 635378
http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20060201/ff6d8e49/attachment.pgp