[asterisk-biz] ATCOM

[Mike Hammett]

How is the physical quality?  It felt like I should have only paid $3 for it 
when I held it before.  I think the handset also fell off the hook on the 
base.


----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Juan Carlos Valero" <jcvalero at capatres.com>
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" 
<asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] ATCOM


> El jue, 07-12-2006 a las 07:49 -0600, Mike Hammett escribió:
>> I previously purchased a couple ATCOM phones and I was not impressed
>> at all with their physical quality, nor the chipset in use.
>>
>> I forget the name of the chipset previously used, but their new
>> products reference an Infineon chipset.  I believe that is new to
>> ATCOM.
>>
>> I wouldn't know of any physical quality increases without purchasing
>> one.
>>
>> Can anyone comment on ATCOM's recent products?
>
> Hi Mike.
>
> sorry for my very bad english !
> Actually the AT530 has good audio quality. None of the problems with PA168 
> chipset (noise, click and silence in the conversation) are here. The 
> firmware need some improvement but ATCOM seems working correctly.
>
> -- 
> Un saludo,
>
> Juan Carlos Valero
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Capa Tres Soluciones Tecnológicas S.L.                      Barcelona
> Visita nuestra página web en:                 http://www.capatres.com
>                           Telef/Fax: 935605424
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>