[Asterisk-biz] Asterisk Ffork - OpenPBX.org
Peter Nixon
listuser at peternixon.net
Sun Oct 9 07:15:47 MST 2005
On Sunday 09 October 2005 00:56, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Dinesh Nair wrote:
> > in this instance, it definitely would be safer for the freebsd folk to
> > use chan_woomera to provide h.323 functionality on asterisk as this is a
> > legal quagmire an open source project (freebsd in this case) cant get
> > mired in.
>
> I have already responded to most of this in my last post, but I will add
> one more point: we could certainly add a clause to the LICENSE file that
> gave distributions the right to make non-substantial modifications to
> the source code for compatibility/etc. without losing the ability to use
> the trademark. This would not allow (for example) bundling in major
> changes such as 'bristuff', but would allow for file locations to be
> changed, permissions modification, that sort of thing, designed for
> compatibility with the platform it's being built for.
Is this your personal position on the matter or are you posting in an official
capacity as a Digium employee?
--
Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
More information about the asterisk-biz
mailing list