[Asterisk-biz] 911 update
Andrew Latham
lathama at gmail.com
Fri May 13 09:58:41 MST 2005
How do you suggest we help? What can we do?
On 5/13/05, Jason P. Talley <jason at nuvio.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> All:
>
>
>
> The FCC went "sunshine" yesterday regarding its May 19th meeting which
> includes 911. Thought I would give you a quick update of the draft language
> and where things stand right now. It is not good.
>
>
>
> It appears that the FCC is going to require "interconnected" VoIP providers
> to deliver an emergency call to the proper PSAP with ALI information (and
> update the databases). This includes all PSAPs and means connections
> through ILECs and RLECS. Just using the RBOCs alone will not even come
> close to satisfying the standard. This is much more stringent than even the
> cellular industry has to adhere to. Before someone on this list goes off
> and says that this is ok, realize that this means interconnecting to more
> than 6600+ PSAPs, devising Psuedo ANI type technology, updating databases,
> etc. This is no small task. And here is the real kicker, the FCC is
> currently discussing an implementation date of 120 days. I am sure that
> some waivers will be possible, but obtaining a waiver is not an easy or
> trivial task. We have no rights to interconnect with any of these services,
> and in some cases, especially RLECs, there is no legal requirement that they
> open the network up even if we were certificated in the state. Also, the
> FCC appears to specifically preserve our liability for lawsuits. This is
> contrary to every other telecom provider who may be subject to state
> protections (remember we are interstate now with none of those benefits).
>
>
>
> Just in case you are wondering who will be affected, consider this. The FCC
> is stating that if you touch the PSTN in any way you will be required to
> comply. This may well affect people like Skype (with Skype out), FWD, and
> most of you on this list. The FCC does not seem to care if you are using
> ATAs, IP phones, or softphones. The fact that you may have to boot a
> computer to use the service seems to be unimportant.
>
>
>
> This is bad stuff for the industry. I am hopeful that during the next week
> as staff meets to work on this a more moderate rule will be adopted,
> especially as it relates to implementation time frame. This is not a
> question of if anymore, just a question of when. Public safety is important
> and should be a core component of any offering, but reality needs to be
> addressed as well.
>
>
>
> -jason
>
>
>
> Jason P. Talley
>
> Chief Executive Officer
>
> NUVIO CORPORATION
>
> Phone: 816-444-4422 ext. 6711
>
> Fax: 816-333-5915
>
> http://www.nuvio.com
>
> jason at nuvio.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Biz mailing list
> Asterisk-Biz at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
>
--
<sig>
Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh)
WWW: http://lathama.com
Email: lathama at lathama.com - lathama at yahoo.com - lathama at gmail.com
If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email!
</sig>
More information about the asterisk-biz
mailing list