[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk - Team Branches > oolong-path-support-trunk > #5 has FAILED (1 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by root.

Bamboo bamboo at asterisk.org
Mon Feb 11 17:59:48 CST 2013


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk - Team Branches > oolong-path-support-trunk > #5 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code has been updated by root.
1/2 jobs failed, with 1 failing test, no failures were new.

http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/ASTTEAM-OOLONGPATHSUPPORTTRUNK-5/


--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
  - Asterisk 1.8 CentOS 6 32-Bit (CentOS 6): 1 of 400 tests failed.



--------------
Code Changes
--------------
root (381187):

>Merged revisions 381177 via svnmerge from 
>file:///srv/subversion/repos/asterisk/trunk
>
>........
>  r381177 | rmudgett | 2013-02-11 12:00:05 -0600 (Mon, 11 Feb 2013) | 13 lines
>  
>  features: Don't cache a struct ast_app pointer.
>  
>  Caching a struct ast_app pointer is not a good idea because someone could
>  unload the application.  After the applicaiton unload the cached ast_app
>  pointer is no longer valid.  Only pbx.c can cache the pointer because it
>  knows when the application is unloaded and removes the pointer.
>  
>  * Fixed one-touch Monitor and MixMonitor to not cache the ast_app pointer
>  and not use the silly monitor_ok/mixmonitor_ok/stopmixmonitor_ok flags.
>  
>  * Extracted bridge_check_monitor() from ast_bridge_call() and use propper
>  locking.
>........
>



--------------
Tests
--------------
Existing Test Failures (1)
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/ s i p/path

--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20130211/5fd38b01/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Test-results mailing list