[svn-commits] mjordan: branch 11 r432277 - /branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c

[SVN commits to the Digium repositories]

Author: mjordan
Date: Wed Feb 25 17:02:17 2015
New Revision: 432277

URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=rev&rev=432277
Log:
channels/chan_sip: Clarify WARNING message in mismatched SRTP scenario

When we receive an SDP as part of an offer/answer for a peer/friend has been
configured to require encryption, and that SDP offer/answer failed to provide
acceptable crypto attributes, we currently issue a WARNING that uses the phrase
"we" and "requested". In this case, both of those terms are ambiguous - the
user will probably think "we" is Asterisk (it most likely isn't) and it may
not be a "request", so much as an SDP that was received in some fashion.

This patch makes the WARNING messages slightly less bad and a bit more
accurate as well.

ASTERISK-23214 #close
Reported by: Rusty Newton

Modified:
    branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c

Modified: branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c?view=diff&rev=432277&r1=432276&r2=432277
==============================================================================
--- branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c (original)
+++ branches/11/channels/chan_sip.c Wed Feb 25 17:02:17 2015
@@ -10420,7 +10420,7 @@
 	}
 
 	if (!secure_audio && p->srtp) {
-		ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "We are requesting SRTP for audio, but they responded without it!\n");
+		ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Failed to receive SDP offer/answer with required SRTP crypto attributes for audio\n");
 		res = -1;
 		goto process_sdp_cleanup;
 	}
@@ -10432,7 +10432,7 @@
 	}
 
 	if (!p->novideo && !secure_video && p->vsrtp) {
-		ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "We are requesting SRTP for video, but they responded without it!\n");
+		ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Failed to receive SDP offer/answer with required SRTP crypto attributes for video\n");
 		res = -1;
 		goto process_sdp_cleanup;
 	}