[svn-commits] mmichelson: trunk r181769 - in /trunk: ./ channels/chan_sip.c

[SVN commits to the Digium repositories]

Author: mmichelson
Date: Thu Mar 12 13:30:58 2009
New Revision: 181769

URL: http://svn.digium.com/svn-view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=181769
Log:
Merged revisions 181768 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

........
  r181768 | mmichelson | 2009-03-12 13:29:48 -0500 (Thu, 12 Mar 2009) | 22 lines
  
  Properly send a 487 on an INVITE we have not responded to if we receive a BYE.
  
  If we receive an INVITE from an endpoint and then later receive a BYE from that
  same endpoint before we have sent a final response for the INVITE, then we need
  to respond to the INVITE with a 487. 
  
  There was logic in the code prior to this commit which seemed to exist solely to 
  handle this situation, but there was one condition in an if statement which 
  was incorrect. The only way we would send a 487 was if the sip_pvt had no owner
  channel. This made no sense since we created the owner channel when we received
  the INVITE, meaning that the majority of the time we would never send the 487.
  The 487 being sent should not rely on whether we have created a channel. Its
  delivery should be dependent on the current state of the initial INVITE transaction.
  With this commit, that logic is now correctly in place.
  
  (closes issue #14149)
  Reported by: legranjl
  Patches:
        14149.patch uploaded by mmichelson (license 60)
  Tested by: legranjl
........

Modified:
    trunk/   (props changed)
    trunk/channels/chan_sip.c

Propchange: trunk/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Binary property 'branch-1.4-merged' - no diff available.

Modified: trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/svn-view/asterisk/trunk/channels/chan_sip.c?view=diff&rev=181769&r1=181768&r2=181769
==============================================================================
--- trunk/channels/chan_sip.c (original)
+++ trunk/channels/chan_sip.c Thu Mar 12 13:30:58 2009
@@ -19947,7 +19947,7 @@
 	struct ast_channel *bridged_to;
 	
 	/* If we have an INCOMING invite that we haven't answered, terminate that transaction */
-	if (p->pendinginvite && !ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && !req->ignore && !p->owner) {
+	if (p->pendinginvite && !ast_test_flag(&p->flags[0], SIP_OUTGOING) && !req->ignore) {
 		transmit_response_reliable(p, "487 Request Terminated", &p->initreq);
 	}