[svn-commits] kpfleming: trunk r200689 - /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c

[SVN commits to the Digium repositories]

Author: kpfleming
Date: Mon Jun 15 15:42:38 2009
New Revision: 200689

URL: http://svn.asterisk.org/svn-view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=200689
Log:
Accept T.38 re-INVITE responses with invalid SDP versions.

This commit changes the 'incoming SDP version' check logic a bit more; when
'ignoresdpversion' is *not* set for a peer, if we initiate a re-INVITE to
switch to T.38, we'll always accept the peer's SDP response, even if they
don't properly increment the SDP version number as they should. If this situation
occurs, a warning message will be generated suggesting that the peer's
configuration be changed to include the 'ignoresdpversion' configuration option
(although ideally they'd fix their SIP implementation to be RFC compliant).


Modified:
    trunk/channels/chan_sip.c

Modified: trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
URL: http://svn.asterisk.org/svn-view/asterisk/trunk/channels/chan_sip.c?view=diff&rev=200689&r1=200688&r2=200689
==============================================================================
--- trunk/channels/chan_sip.c (original)
+++ trunk/channels/chan_sip.c Mon Jun 15 15:42:38 2009
@@ -7824,16 +7824,39 @@
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (ast_test_flag(&p->flags[1], SIP_PAGE2_IGNORESDPVERSION)
-		|| p->sessionversion_remote < 0
-		|| p->sessionversion_remote != rua_version) {
- 		
+	/* we need to check the SDP version number the other end sent us;
+	 * our rules for deciding what to accept are a bit complex.
+	 *
+	 * 1) if 'ignoresdpversion' has been set for this dialog, then
+	 *    we will just accept whatever they sent and assume it is
+	 *    a modification of the session, even if it is not
+	 * 2) otherwise, if this is the first SDP we've seen from them
+	 *    we accept it
+	 * 3) otherwise, if the new SDP version number is higher than the
+	 *    old one, we accept it
+	 * 4) otherwise, if this SDP is in response to us requesting a switch
+	 *    to T.38, we accept the SDP, but also generate a warning message
+	 *    that this peer should have the 'ignoresdpversion' option set,
+	 *    because it is not following the SDP offer/answer RFC; if we did
+	 *    not request a switch to T.38, then we stop parsing the SDP, as it
+	 *    has not changed from the previous version
+	 */
+
+	if (ast_test_flag(&p->flags[1], SIP_PAGE2_IGNORESDPVERSION) ||
+	    (p->sessionversion_remote < 0) ||
+	    (p->sessionversion_remote < rua_version)) {
 		p->sessionversion_remote = rua_version;
 		p->session_modify = TRUE;
-	} else if (p->sessionversion_remote == rua_version) {
-		p->session_modify = FALSE;
-		ast_debug(2, "SDP version number same as previous SDP. Not parsing this SDP.\n");
-		return 0;
+	} else {
+		if (p->t38.state == T38_LOCAL_REINVITE) {
+			p->sessionversion_remote = rua_version;
+			p->session_modify = TRUE;
+			ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Call %s responded to our T.38 reinvite without changing SDP version; 'ignoresdpversion' should be set for this peer.\n", p->callid);
+		} else {
+			p->session_modify = FALSE;
+			ast_debug(2, "Call %s responded to our reinvite without changing SDP version; ignoring SDP.\n", p->callid);
+			return 0;
+		}
 	} 
 
 	/* Try to find first media stream */