[svn-commits] mmichelson: branch 1.6.0 r138688 - in /branches/1.6.0: ./ apps/app_queue.c

[SVN commits to the Digium repositories]

Author: mmichelson
Date: Mon Aug 18 15:05:09 2008
New Revision: 138688

URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=138688
Log:
Merged revisions 138687 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk

................
r138687 | mmichelson | 2008-08-18 15:04:10 -0500 (Mon, 18 Aug 2008) | 18 lines

Merged revisions 138685 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

........
r138685 | mmichelson | 2008-08-18 15:01:14 -0500 (Mon, 18 Aug 2008) | 10 lines

Change the inequalities used in app_queue with regards
to timeouts from being strict to non-strict for more
accuracy.

(closes issue #13239)
Reported by: atis
Patches:
      app_queue_timeouts_v2.patch uploaded by atis (license 242)


........

................

Modified:
    branches/1.6.0/   (props changed)
    branches/1.6.0/apps/app_queue.c

Propchange: branches/1.6.0/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Binary property 'trunk-merged' - no diff available.

Modified: branches/1.6.0/apps/app_queue.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/branches/1.6.0/apps/app_queue.c?view=diff&rev=138688&r1=138687&r2=138688
==============================================================================
--- branches/1.6.0/apps/app_queue.c (original)
+++ branches/1.6.0/apps/app_queue.c Mon Aug 18 15:05:09 2008
@@ -2810,7 +2810,7 @@
 			break;
 
 		/* If we have timed out, break out */
-		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) > qe->expire)) {
+		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) >= qe->expire)) {
 			*reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -2845,7 +2845,7 @@
 			break;
 
 		/* If we have timed out, break out */
-		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) > qe->expire)) {
+		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) >= qe->expire)) {
 			*reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -2856,12 +2856,12 @@
 			break;
 		
 		/* see if we need to move to the next penalty level for this queue */
-		while (qe->pr && ((time(NULL) - qe->start) > qe->pr->time)) {
+		while (qe->pr && ((time(NULL) - qe->start) >= qe->pr->time)) {
 			update_qe_rule(qe);
 		}
 
 		/* If we have timed out, break out */
-		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) > qe->expire)) {
+		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) >= qe->expire)) {
 			*reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -2875,7 +2875,7 @@
 		}
 		
 		/* If we have timed out, break out */
-		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) > qe->expire)) {
+		if (qe->expire && (time(NULL) >= qe->expire)) {
 			*reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -3200,7 +3200,7 @@
 	 * This should be extremely rare. queue_exec will take care
 	 * of removing the caller and reporting the timeout as the reason.
 	 */
-	if (qe->expire && now > qe->expire) {
+	if (qe->expire && now >= qe->expire) {
 		res = 0;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -4637,7 +4637,7 @@
 		enum queue_member_status stat;
 
 		/* Leave if we have exceeded our queuetimeout */
-		if (qe.expire && (time(NULL) > qe.expire)) {
+		if (qe.expire && (time(NULL) >= qe.expire)) {
 			record_abandoned(&qe);
 			reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			res = 0;
@@ -4660,7 +4660,7 @@
 				goto stop;
 	
 		/* Leave if we have exceeded our queuetimeout */
-		if (qe.expire && (time(NULL) > qe.expire)) {
+		if (qe.expire && (time(NULL) >= qe.expire)) {
 			record_abandoned(&qe);
 			reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			res = 0;
@@ -4716,7 +4716,7 @@
 		}
 
 		/* Leave if we have exceeded our queuetimeout */
-		if (qe.expire && (time(NULL) > qe.expire)) {
+		if (qe.expire && (time(NULL) >= qe.expire)) {
 			record_abandoned(&qe);
 			reason = QUEUE_TIMEOUT;
 			res = 0;