[libpri-commits] mattf: branch 1.4 r462 - in /branches/1.4: ./ pri.c pri_facility.c

[SVN commits to the libpri project]

Author: mattf
Date: Thu Sep  6 10:11:29 2007
New Revision: 462

URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/libpri?view=rev&rev=462
Log:
Merged revisions 460 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.2

........
r460 | mattf | 2007-09-06 10:06:42 -0500 (Thu, 06 Sep 2007) | 1 line

TBCT now works.  It should work for NI2, 4E, and 5E.  This code was tested on NI2.
........

Modified:
    branches/1.4/   (props changed)
    branches/1.4/pri.c
    branches/1.4/pri_facility.c

Propchange: branches/1.4/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- branch-1.2-merged (original)
+++ branch-1.2-merged Thu Sep  6 10:11:29 2007
@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
-/branches/1.2:1-332,385,389,415,423,426,445
+/branches/1.2:1-332,385,389,415,423,426,445,460

Modified: branches/1.4/pri.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/libpri/branches/1.4/pri.c?view=diff&rev=462&r1=461&r2=462
==============================================================================
--- branches/1.4/pri.c (original)
+++ branches/1.4/pri.c Thu Sep  6 10:11:29 2007
@@ -529,22 +529,36 @@
 	if (!call1 || !call2)
 		return -1;
 
+	/* Make sure we have compatible switchtypes */
+	if (call1->pri->switchtype != call2->pri->switchtype)
+		return -1;
+
 	/* Check for bearer capability */
 	if (call1->transcapability != call2->transcapability)
 		return -1;
-	/* Check to see if calls are on the same PRI dchannel
-	 * Currently only support calls on the same dchannel
-	 */
+
+	/* Check to see if we're on the same PRI */
 	if (call1->pri != call2->pri)
 		return -1;
 	
-	if (call1->pri->switchtype == PRI_SWITCH_LUCENT5E)
-		return eect_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2);
-
-	if (call1->pri->switchtype == PRI_SWITCH_DMS100)
-		return rlt_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2);
-
-	return -1;
+	switch (call1->pri->switchtype) {
+		case PRI_SWITCH_NI2:
+		case PRI_SWITCH_LUCENT5E:
+		case PRI_SWITCH_ATT4ESS:
+			if (eect_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2))
+				return -1;
+			else
+				return 0;
+			break;
+		case PRI_SWITCH_DMS100:
+			if (rlt_initiate_transfer(call1->pri, call1, call2))
+				return -1;
+			else
+				return 0;
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -1;
+	}
 }
 
 int pri_hangup(struct pri *pri, q931_call *call, int cause)

Modified: branches/1.4/pri_facility.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/libpri/branches/1.4/pri_facility.c?view=diff&rev=462&r1=461&r2=462
==============================================================================
--- branches/1.4/pri_facility.c (original)
+++ branches/1.4/pri_facility.c Thu Sep  6 10:11:29 2007
@@ -1081,13 +1081,10 @@
 /* EECT functions */
 int eect_initiate_transfer(struct pri *pri, q931_call *c1, q931_call *c2)
 {
-	/* Did all the tests to see if we're on the same PRI and
-	 * are on a compatible switchtype */
-	/* TODO */
 	int i = 0;
 	int res = 0;
 	unsigned char buffer[255] = "";
-	unsigned short call_reference = c2->cr;
+	short call_reference = c2->cr ^ 0x8000;  /* Let's do the trickery to make sure the flag is correct */
 	struct rose_component *comp = NULL, *compstk[10];
 	int compsp = 0;
 	static unsigned char op_tag[] = {
@@ -1100,16 +1097,7 @@
 		0x08,
 	};
 
-	buffer[i++] = (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | Q932_PROTOCOL_EXTENSIONS);
-	/* Interpretation component */
-
-	ASN1_ADD_SIMPLE(comp, COMP_TYPE_NFE, buffer, i);
-	ASN1_PUSH(compstk, compsp, comp);
-	ASN1_ADD_BYTECOMP(comp, (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | ASN1_TAG_0), buffer, i, 0);
-	ASN1_ADD_BYTECOMP(comp, (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | ASN1_TAG_2), buffer, i, 0);
-	ASN1_FIXUP(compstk, compsp, buffer, i);
-
-	ASN1_ADD_BYTECOMP(comp, COMP_TYPE_INTERPRETATION, buffer, i, 0);
+	buffer[i++] = (ASN1_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | Q932_PROTOCOL_ROSE);
 
 	ASN1_ADD_SIMPLE(comp, COMP_TYPE_INVOKE, buffer, i);
 	ASN1_PUSH(compstk, compsp, comp);