[Dundi] DUNDi for inter carrier exchange

[Anders Brownworth]

So I would think we need to get DUNDi distributed as a library so people 
can include it in their resolvers. Is such an initiative underway 
somewhere? I don't know if that means just pulling the code out of 
Asterisk and making it a library or rebuilding it from scratch. Either 
way, I would think a library is what we need to get more widespread 
adoption, particularly amongst larger carriers not willing to use Asterisk.

-Anders Brownworth
R&D
Bandwidth.com

Mark Spencer wrote:
> You've summed it up just right.  The nice thing of DUNDi as the top 
> level is that you can have other technologies (e.g. 302 redirect) or 
> anything else underneath for storing overlapping directories.
>
> Mark
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Anders Brownworth wrote:
>
>> I might be a little out of the loop on this but at one point Mark was 
>> talking about layering DUNDi over the various ENUM solutions. Or I 
>> guess I should say using DUNDi as the top-most resolver over 
>> "anything else" because for example with ENUM which is based on DNS, 
>> numbers don't divide up cleanly the way names do. DUNDi doesn't 
>> enforce that walled garden on numbers, so IMHO it's better suited to 
>> being a top level resolver.
>>
>> Again, I may be in the dark on current activity, but I would think 
>> there should be an initiative for a DUNDi sample library distributed 
>> on it's own. (outside of the Asterisk codebase) IMHO, it should be.
>>
>> -Anders Brownworth
>> R&D
>> Bandwidth.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dundi mailing list
>> Dundi at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Dundi mailing list
> Dundi at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi