[Dundi] Looking Glass

[Brian West]

Ok I think the new LG is more of what we need.  It doesn't display any
identifying info about the route and I think that still follows the spirit
of the GPA... What about you?

bkw

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dundi-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:dundi-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Scott Wolf
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:34 PM
> To: Distributed Universal Number Discovery
> Subject: Re: [Dundi] Looking Glass
> 
> I am now filtering out all user/pass's, EID's, and IP/Host's. Basically
> just if a route exists, and cache info. EID lookup is also disabled.
> 
> Would a click through of the GPA be enough to allow full access?
> 
> Scott Wolf
> wolfson
> 
> Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Yes/No is a bit too little. You might want to know, if a old entry
> is being
> 	pushed or not. So masking the output to a certain degree probably is
> the best
> 	solution.
> 
> 	/Marlow
> 
> 	Quoting Brian West <brian at bkw.org> <mailto:brian at bkw.org> :
> 
> 
> 
> 		I think the tool is acceptable if any info about where or
who
> the number
> 		goes is masked.  I think the best response is to say YES we
> see it or NO we
> 		don't and the weight of the result if any.  It will also
help
> try to see if
> 		the rest of the network sees you from X or Y perspective.
> What does
> 		everyone else think?
> 
> 		bkw
> 
> 
> 
> 			-----Original Message-----
> 			From: dundi-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:dundi-
> 			bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mark Spencer
> 			Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:43 PM
> 			To: dundi at lists.digium.com
> 			Subject: Re: [Dundi] Looking Glass
> 
> 			The DUNDi Looking Glass, while neat, is also in
> violation of GPA section
> 			2f:
> 
> 			     (f) A Participant may not disclose any specific
> Route, Service or
> 			         Participant contact information obtained
from
> the Peering System
> 			         to any party outside of the Peering System
> except as a
> 			         by-product of facilitating communication in
> accordance with
> 			         section 2e (e.g., phone books or other
> databases may not be
> 			         published, but the Internet addresses of
the
> Egress Gateway or
> 			         Service does not need to be obfuscated.)
> 
> 			I would like to solicit feedback from the list about
how
> this tool might
> 			be more appropriately used.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	Dundi mailing list
> 	Dundi at lists.digium.com
> 	http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
> 
>