<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>I would have said the same thing a while back but, I can't ignore the fact that there have been what seems to be many "Virtualization" success stories.<div><br></div><div>The idea that Asterisk just likes to be on it's own dedicated hardware has always caused me to prefer dedicated hardware.</div><div><br></div><div>But, is the possibility of a single piece of hardware failing "better" than something that will likely never just flat out die?</div><div><br></div><div>I know there are high availability solutions out there and it's not that I don't have backups and disaster recovery plans in place.</div><div><br></div><div>I just want to make things far better regarding redundancy, recovery and scalability and virtualization is hard to beat when you start talking about these things.</div><div><br></div><div>There are definitely people/companies using virtualized Asterisk solutions successfully, so I feel like it can be done.</div><div><br></div><div>Asterisk has come a long way since I first starting messing with Asterisk and so has Asterisk itself.</div><div><br></div><div>So, I am trying to determine what is bad, what to look out for in terms of virtualizing. If it's still as bad of an idea as it was say 5 years ago, then I need to understand why and if there is a work around.</div><div><br></div><div>At this point, the benefits of virtualizing my Asterisk boxes are too many to count. So, if I can't find any concrete reasons to NOT do this beyond "That's a bad idea" then I am going to give it a go. If I do, I am looking for any advice good or bad from those that have gone down this road successfully or with miserable failure.</div><div><br></div><div>My opinion all along has been Asterisk + Virtualization + Real Live Production Use = BAD IDEA!</div><div><br></div><div>Now, I am trying to figure out if that's just the opinion of an old man (sort of old) who just doesn't want to accept that virtualization if a better way (in terms of Asterisk).</div><div><br></div><div>So, I am hoping for people to tell me why Amazon AWS specifically is a good or bad idea with as much detail as possible.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!<br><br><div>> To: tjrlist@live.com; asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<br>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Amazon, Asterisk and reliability beyond a hobby system?<br>> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:04:44 -0500<br>> From: covici@ccs.covici.com<br>> <br>> I would thinktwice about Amazon -- and virtual in general is not a good<br>> idea for this sort of thing. I have seen messages about bad results<br>> with amazon specifically.<br>> <br>> Todd R. <tjrlist@live.com> wrote:<br>> <br>> > Just checking one more time to see if anyone has an opinion on this. I am primarily interested in using a cloud type setup such as Amazon AWS for the redundancy, easy backup and recovery options. It's not about price but the idea that it will be very hard for a single piece of hardware to ruin my day.<br>> > <br>> > From: tjrlist@live.com<br>> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<br>> > Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:33:38 -0600<br>> > Subject: [asterisk-users] Amazon, Asterisk and reliability beyond a hobby system?<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Took me a while but I have finally embraced cloud computing and all the benefits.<br>> > The only thing I have yet to feel comfortable about putting in the cloud is real live Asterisk boxes to be used in production. I know it's being done because as far as I know Twilio is using Amazon for their Asterisk boxes.<br>> > I have read all the fun articles on building hobby type systems and that's all great.<br>> > What I really need to hear is from those that have deployed Asterisk in Amazon or Digital Ocean and how many simultaneous calls they are pushing through it and what the call quality and reliability has been.<br>> > Right now I am still using dedicated hardware but I could become much more redundant and scale much faster using Amazon or Digital Ocean.<br>> > Thanks in advance for any information from those that have already been down this road... <br>> > <br>> > -- <br>> > _____________________________________________________________________<br>> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<br>> > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>> > http://www.asterisk.org/hello<br>> > <br>> > asterisk-users mailing list<br>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users <br>> > ----------------------------------------------------<br>> > Alternatives:<br>> > <br>> > ----------------------------------------------------<br>> > -- <br>> > _____________________________________________________________________<br>> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<br>> > New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>> > http://www.asterisk.org/hello<br>> > <br>> > asterisk-users mailing list<br>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<br>> -- <br>> Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:<br>> How do<br>> you spend it?<br>> <br>> John Covici<br>> covici@ccs.covici.com<br></div></div> </div></body>
</html>