<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/1/31 Ishfaq Malik <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ish@pack-net.co.uk" target="_blank">ish@pack-net.co.uk</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 14:10 -0700, Carlos Alvarez wrote:<br>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:05 PM, XBrian <<a href="mailto:boboodz@yahoo.co.uk">boboodz@yahoo.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thanks - I was hoping there was some silver bullet to use out<br>
> there. Thanks<br>
> anyway.<br>
><br>
><br>
> There is. If you build a reliable network, the phones will simply<br>
> never have a problem. We've got customers with phones that have never<br>
> lost contact for years. Re-registering is just a crutch for a network<br>
> defect.<br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Carlos Alvarez<br>
> TelEvolve<br>
> <a href="tel:602-889-3003" value="+16028893003">602-889-3003</a><br>
><br>
><br>
This is so true!<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If you have no NAT or dynamic IP in your network, you can just remove the registration process and assign to each peer its IP address.</div><div><br></div><div>Leandro</div>
</div>