<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Lee Howard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:faxguy@howardsilvan.com" target="_blank">faxguy@howardsilvan.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">I recognize that you're being a bit facetious in this latter comment</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, not really. I stand by it. Useless and *should* be dead. It's dead and people just don't know it.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">There is no adequate replacement for fax. E-mail doesn't do it</div></blockquote><div>
<br></div><div>Yes, it does.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Well, if you were using stand-alone fax machines then that was part of your problem.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That was actually the only part of my post that was in jest.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>
<div><br></div>-- <br><div>Carlos Alvarez</div><div>TelEvolve</div><div>602-889-3003</div><div><br></div><br>