<p>Why not use the DIALSTATUS channel variable to determine if a fail over is necessary? </p>
<p>- Logan</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 24, 2012 6:00 AM, "Thomas Kenyon" <<a href="mailto:digium@sanguinarius.co.uk">digium@sanguinarius.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I have noticed a peculiar problem recently with the way that the failover operates in my dialplan.<br>
<br>
I normally have:<br>
<br>
1,Dial(SIP/<provider-1>/<u></u>extension)<br>
n,Dial(SIP/<provider-2>/<u></u>extension)<br>
<br>
(or something similar).<br>
<br>
This has up until now worked flawlessly.<br>
<br>
If there is an error with the first provider, the call is completed with the second one.<br>
<br>
Now, what is happening is, if the remote party hags up first, then the call progresses to the next priority and re-dials them.<br>
<br>
Is this a change in default behaviour?<br>
Do I need to add a particular flag / config directive to my dialplan<br>
<br>
I am running Asterisk 10.6.0.<br>
<br>
Thanks for any help in solving this.<br>
<br>
--<br>
______________________________<u></u>______________________________<u></u>_________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>
<a href="http://www.asterisk.org/hello" target="_blank">http://www.asterisk.org/hello</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/asterisk-<u></u>users</a><br>
</blockquote></div>