<div dir="ltr">Thanks for reply and share your techniques, dialplans and knowledge on this thread. But my question was not related to load-balancing. I want to know , Why freeSwitch can preferred with compare to Asterisk(Call base , quality base)? And what is architecture difference between them. <br>
<br><br>I am totally agree that by using SIPp we can not relay that server can handle so much load. because by using MOH only CPU load can major and we can check how many thread asterisk can open. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Kevin P. Fleming <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kpfleming@digium.com">kpfleming@digium.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 02/09/2012 01:17 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If the MOH thing is really true, a more "realistic" test would be to run<br>
playback(demo-instruct). Since I know that I will eventually cross this<br>
bridge in real life/real time, I devised this test on my Asterisk 10.0 box<br>
<br>
Dialplan (in default context)<br>
exten => 3366,1,answer()<br>
exten => 3366,n,playback(demo-instruct,<u></u>noanswer)<br>
exten => 3366,n,playback(demo-instruct,<u></u>noanswer)<br>
exten => 3366,n,playback(vm-goodbye,<u></u>noanswer)<br>
exten => 3366,n,hangup()<br>
<br>
SIPP command<br>
./sipp -l 399 -d 99000 -m 399 -s 3366 -p 5061 -sn uac 127.0.0.1 -trace_err<br>
<br>
I was able to do 260 concurrent calls with no issues. The 2 playbacks for<br>
demo-instruct were to cover 99 seconds since the file is only 67 seconds<br>
long. For the 300/1000 call scenario, you would need to duplicate the line<br>
accordingly. The limiting factor for me was my rtp.conf. I set up a range<br>
of 10001-10520 which stopped at 260 since each "call" allocates 4 rtp slots<br>
(2 in use and 2 for transfer, etc).<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
That's not quite correct. RTP ports are not allocated for 'transfers'. 2 ports are used for each media stream that can be used on a channel. Since each channel has an audio stream, that will consume 2 ports. If video support is enabled for the channel (even if it is not in use), then 2 more ports will be consumed.<br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>
-- <br>
Kevin P. Fleming<br>
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies<br>
Jabber: <a href="mailto:kfleming@digium.com" target="_blank">kfleming@digium.com</a> | SIP: <a href="mailto:kpfleming@digium.com" target="_blank">kpfleming@digium.com</a> | Skype: kpfleming<br>
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA<br>
Check us out at <a href="http://www.digium.com" target="_blank">www.digium.com</a> & <a href="http://www.asterisk.org" target="_blank">www.asterisk.org</a></font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
--<br>
______________________________<u></u>______________________________<u></u>_________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>
<a href="http://www.asterisk.org/hello" target="_blank">http://www.asterisk.org/hello</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/asterisk-<u></u>users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><br>Thanks and regards<br><br> Virendra Bhati<br>+91-8885268942<br>Software Engineer<br>E-mail-: <a href="mailto:virbhati@gmail.com" target="_blank">virbhati@gmail.com</a><br>
Skype id:- virbhati2<br></div><br>
</div>